Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36197713›Full record

Observational studyJMIR mHealth and uHealth2022

Electronic Health Diary Campaigns to Complement Longitudinal Assessments in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis: Nested Observational Study.

Chloé Sieber, Deborah Chiavi, Christina Haag, Marco Kaufmann, Andrea B Horn, Holger Dressel, Chiara Zecca, Pasquale Calabrese, Caroline Pot, Christian Philipp Kamm and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chloé SieberSwiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6642-5082
Deborah ChiaviSwiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0595-2054
Christina HaagSwiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9662-5245
Marco KaufmannSwiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4810-7734
Andrea B HornUniversity Research Priority Program "Dynamics of Healthy Aging", University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2729-7062
Holger DresselDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1268-0416
Chiara ZeccaMultiple Sclerosis Center, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9990-3431
Pasquale CalabreseNeuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology Unit, Division of Molecular and Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3347-5187
Caroline PotService of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1146-3129
Christian Philipp KammDepartment of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3906-0161
Viktor von WylSwiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8754-9797
Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry *See Acknowledgments, .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic health diaries hold promise in complementing standardized surveys in prospective health studies but are fraught with numerous methodological challenges.

objectiveThe study aimed to investigate participant characteristics and other factors associated with response to an electronic health diary campaign in persons with multiple sclerosis, identify recurrent topics in free-text diary entries, and assess the added value of structured diary entries with regard to current symptoms and medication intake when compared with survey-collected information.

methodsData were collected by the Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry during a nested electronic health diary campaign and during a regular semiannual Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry follow-up survey serving as comparator. The characteristics of campaign participants were descriptively compared with those of nonparticipants. Diary content was analyzed using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count 2015 software (Pennebaker Conglomerates, Inc) and descriptive keyword analyses. The similarities between structured diary data and follow-up survey data on health-related quality of life, symptoms, and medication intake were examined using the Jaccard index.

resultsCampaign participants (n=134; diary entries: n=815) were more often women, were not working full time, did not have a higher education degree, had a more advanced gait impairment, and were on average 5 years older (median age 52.5, IQR 43.25-59.75 years) than eligible nonparticipants (median age 47, IQR 38-55 years; n=524). Diary free-text entries (n=632; participants: n=100) most often contained references to the following standard Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count word categories: negative emotion (193/632, 30.5%), body parts or body functioning (191/632, 30.2%), health (94/632, 14.9%), or work (67/632, 10.6%). Analogously, the most frequently mentioned keywords (diary entries: n=526; participants: n=93) were "good," "day," and "work." Similarities between diary data and follow-up survey data, collected 14 months apart (median), were high for health-related quality of life and stable for slow-changing symptoms such as fatigue or gait disorder. Similarities were also comparatively high for drugs requiring a regular application, including interferon beta-1a (Avonex) and glatiramer acetate (Copaxone), and for modern oral therapies such as fingolimod (Gilenya) and teriflunomide (Aubagio).

conclusionsDiary campaign participation seemed dependent on time availability and symptom burden and was enhanced by reminder emails. Electronic health diaries are a meaningful complement to regular structured surveys and can provide more detailed information regarding medication use and symptoms. However, they should ideally be embedded into promotional activities or tied to concrete research study tasks to enhance regular and long-term participation.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisAdultCrotonatesElectronicsFemaleFingolimod HydrochlorideGlatiramer AcetateHumansHydroxybutyratesInterferon beta-1aMaleMedical RecordsMiddle AgedNitrilesQuality of LifeToluidinesCrotonatesFingolimod HydrochlorideGlatiramer AcetateHydroxybutyratesInterferon beta-1aNitrilesteriflunomideToluidinesadherencediarydigital healthelectronic health diarymultiple sclerosisnatural language processingparticipationpatient-reported outcomeregistryunstructured text

Identifiers

PMID36197713
PMCPMC9582921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.