ArticleJMIR human factors2022
The Development and Use of Chatbots in Public Health: Scoping Review.
Article in JMIR human factors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 57 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of Vaccine Chatbot on HPV Vaccine Awareness and Vaccination for Middle School Girls in China: a Randomized Controlled Trial and Implementation Science Study
Evaluation of a Vaccine Chatbot on HPV Vaccine Confidence and Hesitancy: a Randomized Controlled Trial and Implementation Science Study
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acceptability, Usability, and Clinical Appropriateness of an AI-Powered Tool for Linkage to HIV Services After HIV Self-Testing in South Africa: Mixed Methods Evaluation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Communicating With Children With Cancer: Development of a Chatbot-Based Educational Support Tool.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- Barriers to Population Data Use in Overdose Fatality Reviews: Observational and Interview Study of Dashboard Deployment.JMIR human factors · 2026Observational
- An Acceptance Criteria Framework for Determining the Implementation Fit of Custom Large Language Models in Public Health Interventions.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Metrics Used for the Evaluation of Chatbots Providing Cancer Genetic Risk Assessment and Education: Systematic Review.JMIR AI · 2026Review
- Engagement with a Chatbot-based Intervention for the delivery of mailed at-home COVID-19 Testing: a Descriptive Log Analysis Study from the SCALE-UP II Trial.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Portraying Ethical Risks of Medical AI: Mixed Methods Study From Connotation Definition to a Survey on Physicians' Cognition.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Eye-Tracked Visual Attention to Anthropomorphic Appearance and Empathic Responses in AI Medical Conversational Agents: Dissociating Trust Gains from Attentional Synergy.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Article
- Patient Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedic Surgery: Identifying Potential Barriers to Acceptance and Disparities With Implementation.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026Article
- AI in hematology: A new frontier for nursing practice and patient care.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Review
- Primary care and community interventions for multimorbidity involving depression or anxiety: systematic review with meta-analysis.BMJ medicine · 2026Article
- Clinician and patient perspectives on digital technology platforms for healthcare delivery.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Parental and child perspectives on healthy lifestyles and artificial intelligence chatbot use among childhood and adolescent cancer survivors: a descriptive comparative study in South Korea.Child health nursing research · 2026Article
- Behavior Emotion Therapy System and You: Co-Design and Evaluation of a Mental Health Chatbot and Digital Human for Mild to Moderate Anxiety in Healthy Participants.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Recommendations for Mental Health Chatbot Conversations: An Integrative Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Review
- Development of a Smart Health Care Service Using Metaverse and Chatbot Technologies for Adolescents, Parents, and School Health Teachers: User-Centered Design Approach.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Women's Preferences and Willingness to Pay for AI Chatbots in Women's Health: Discrete Choice Experiment Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Chatbot for the Return of Positive Genetic Screening Results for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Prompt Engineering Project.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing Medicine: Chatbots as Catalysts for Improved Diagnosis, Treatment, and Patient Support.Cureus · 2025Review
- The Application of Preventive Medicine in the Future Digital Health Era.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChatbots are computer programs that present a conversation-like interface through which people can access information and services. The COVID-19 pandemic has driven a substantial increase in the use of chatbots to support and complement traditional health care systems. However, despite the uptake in their use, evidence to support the development and deployment of chatbots in public health remains limited. Recent reviews have focused on the use of chatbots during the COVID-19 pandemic and the use of conversational agents in health care more generally. This paper complements this research and addresses a gap in the literature by assessing the breadth and scope of research evidence for the use of chatbots across the domain of public health.
objectiveThis scoping review had 3 main objectives: (1) to identify the application domains in public health in which there is the most evidence for the development and use of chatbots; (2) to identify the types of chatbots that are being deployed in these domains; and (3) to ascertain the methods and methodologies by which chatbots are being evaluated in public health applications. This paper explored the implications for future research on the development and deployment of chatbots in public health in light of the analysis of the evidence for their use.
methodsFollowing the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines for scoping reviews, relevant studies were identified through searches conducted in the MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, and Open Grey databases from mid-June to August 2021. Studies were included if they used or evaluated chatbots for the purpose of prevention or intervention and for which the evidence showed a demonstrable health impact.
resultsOf the 1506 studies identified, 32 were included in the review. The results show a substantial increase in the interest of chatbots in the past few years, shortly before the pandemic. Half (16/32, 50%) of the research evaluated chatbots applied to mental health or COVID-19. The studies suggest promise in the application of chatbots, especially to easily automated and repetitive tasks, but overall, the evidence for the efficacy of chatbots for prevention and intervention across all domains is limited at present.
conclusionsMore research is needed to fully understand the effectiveness of using chatbots in public health. Concerns with the clinical, legal, and ethical aspects of the use of chatbots for health care are well founded given the speed with which they have been adopted in practice. Future research on their use should address these concerns through the development of expertise and best practices specific to public health, including a greater focus on user experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.