Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36197625›Full record

ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2022

Biomarkers in HFpEF for Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Biological Phenotyping.

Moemen Eltelbany, Palak Shah, Christopher deFilippi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current heart failure reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Proteomics of the heart.Physiological reviews · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Moemen EltelbanyInova Heart and Vascular Institute, Suite 1225, 3300, Gallows Rd, Falls Church, VA, 22042, USA.
Palak ShahInova Heart and Vascular Institute, Suite 1225, 3300, Gallows Rd, Falls Church, VA, 22042, USA.
Christopher deFilippiInova Heart and Vascular Institute, Suite 1225, 3300, Gallows Rd, Falls Church, VA, 22042, USA. Christopher.deFilippi@Inova.org.ORCID 0000-0002-0660-4943
Alaska Heart and Vascular Institute · USInova Fairfax Hospital · US

Funding

The optimal loop diuretic: mechanistic insights from longitudinal changes in blood and urine proteins to explain efficacy and safety of torsemide vs furosemide after a heart failure hospitalizationR01HL154768 · NHLBI · INOVA HEALTH CARE SERVICES · PI COOPER, LAUREN BETH, DEFILIPPI, CHRISTOPHER R · 2020 to 2023
$1.6M
Clonal hematopoiesis and severity of COVID-19 diseaseR21AG072095 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI DEFILIPPI, CHRISTOPHER R, WALSH, KENNETH · 2021 to 2022
$457k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL154768NIA NIH HHS R21 AG072095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe heterogeneity of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is responsible for the limited success of broad management strategies. The role of biomarkers has been evolving helping to provide insight into the diversity of pathophysiology, prognosis, and potential targets for treatments. We will review the role of traditional and novel biomarkers in diagnosing, prognosticating, and evolving the management of patients with HFpEF. As circulating biomarker discovery rapidly evolves, we will explore technology for new biomarker discovery with examples of successful implementation. RECENT

findingsBesides cardiac-specific biomarkers (natriuretic peptides and troponin), other novel nonspecific biomarkers increasingly identify the diversity of pathophysiological mechanisms of HFpEF including inflammation, fibrosis, and renal dysfunction. Newer approaches have provided increasing granularity providing opportunities to integrate large amounts of information from proteomics and genomics as biomarkers of interest in HFpEF. HFpEF has been marked with failure of many medications to show benefit, whether measuring single targeted biomarkers or broader targeted discovery proteomics or genomic circulating biomarkers are providing increasing opportunities to better understand and manage HFpEF patients.

Indexed as

Heart FailureBiomarkersHumansNatriuretic PeptidesPrognosisStroke VolumeBiomarkersNatriuretic PeptidesBiological phenotypingBiomarkersHFpEFMicroRNAsNatriuretic peptidesProteomics

Identifiers

PMID36197625
OpenAlexW4301595031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.