Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36197618›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

An overview of remote monitoring methods in biodiversity conservation.

Rout George Kerry, Francis Jesmar Perez Montalbo, Rajeswari Das, Sushmita Patra, Gyana Prakash Mahapatra, Ganesh Kumar Maurya, Vinayak Nayak, Atala Bihari Jena, Kingsley Eghonghon Ukhurebor, Ram Chandra Jena and 3 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Rout George KerryDepartment of Biotechnology, Utkal University, Vani Vihar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751004, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2943-3681
Francis Jesmar Perez MontalboCollege of Informatics and Computing Sciences, Batangas State University, Batangas, Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1493-5080
Rajeswari DasDepartment of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, School of Agriculture, GIET University, Gunupur, Rayagada, Odisha, 765022, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9367-3954
Sushmita PatraIndian Council of Agricultural Research-Directorate of Foot and Mouth Disease-International Centre for Foot and Mouth Disease, Arugul, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 752050, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8624-3323
Gyana Prakash MahapatraDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 0C7, Canada.
Ganesh Kumar MauryaZoology Section, Mahila MahaVidyalya, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, India.
Vinayak NayakIndian Council of Agricultural Research-Directorate of Foot and Mouth Disease-International Centre for Foot and Mouth Disease, Arugul, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 752050, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1516-5161
Atala Bihari JenaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1690-7913
Kingsley Eghonghon UkhureborDepartment of Physics, Edo State University Uzairue, P.B.M. 04, Auchi, Edo State, 312101, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7595-3939
Ram Chandra JenaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utkal University, Vani Vihar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751004, India.
Sushanto GoudaDepartment of Zoology, Mizoram University, Aizawl, 796009, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5117-683X
Sanatan MajhiDepartment of Biotechnology, Utkal University, Vani Vihar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751004, India. sanatanm@gmail.com.
Jyoti Ranjan RoutSchool of Biological Sciences, AIPH University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 752101, India. routjr@aiph.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9717-4901

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conservation of biodiversity is critical for the coexistence of humans and the sustenance of other living organisms within the ecosystem. Identification and prioritization of specific regions to be conserved are impossible without proper information about the sites. Advanced monitoring agencies like the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) had accredited that the sum total of species that are now threatened with extinction is higher than ever before in the past and are progressing toward extinct at an alarming rate. Besides this, the conceptualized global responses to these crises are still inadequate and entail drastic changes. Therefore, more sophisticated monitoring and conservation techniques are required which can simultaneously cover a larger surface area within a stipulated time frame and gather a large pool of data. Hence, this study is an overview of remote monitoring methods in biodiversity conservation via a survey of evidence-based reviews and related studies, wherein the description of the application of some technology for biodiversity conservation and monitoring is highlighted. Finally, the paper also describes various transformative smart technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) and/or machine learning algorithms for enhanced working efficiency of currently available techniques that will aid remote monitoring methods in biodiversity conservation.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemArtificial IntelligenceBiodiversityArtificial intelligenceGeographic information systemMolecular techniquesRemote sensingWildlife conservation

Identifiers

PMID36197618
PMCPMC9534007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.