Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36197520›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023

Comparing weight loss outcomes after conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus duodenal switch from sleeve gastrectomy in a community hospital.

Jeremy Jen, Hau Phan, Brett Johnson, Corliann Blyn, Janet Lavrich, Krishna Mallem, Priya Kalsank Pai, Piotr Krecioch

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeremy JenDepartment of Surgery, Mercy Catholic Medical Center, 1500 Lansdowne Avenue, Darby, PA, 19123, USA. jeremy.jen@mercyhealth.org.ORCID 0000-0003-1360-8077
Hau PhanDepartment of Surgery, Mercy Catholic Medical Center, 1500 Lansdowne Avenue, Darby, PA, 19123, USA.
Brett JohnsonDepartment of Surgery, Mercy Catholic Medical Center, 1500 Lansdowne Avenue, Darby, PA, 19123, USA.
Corliann BlynPhiladelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Janet LavrichUniversity of New England College of Osteopathic Medicine, Biddeford, ME, USA.
Krishna MallemDrexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Priya Kalsank PaiKasturba Medical College, Manipal, India.
Piotr KreciochDepartment of Surgery, Mercy Catholic Medical Center, 1500 Lansdowne Avenue, Darby, PA, 19123, USA.
Catholic Medical Center · USDrexel University · USKasturba Medical College, Manipal · INNew England College · USPhiladelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecidivism after initial sleeve gastrectomy (SG) remains common. Revisional surgery to convert SG to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or duodenal switch (DS) for additional weight loss is increasing. This study aims to compare the outcomes after conversion of SG to RYGB or DS.

methodsA retrospective single-institution review was conducted from 2015 to 2021, identifying 75 patients who underwent conversion from prior SG to either RYGB (40) or DS (35). Mean excess body weight loss (EBWL) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months was assessed and compared. Secondary measures of length of stay (LOS), procedure length, and 30-day readmission rate were also reviewed.

resultsPercentage EBWL for RYGB vs DS was 24.0% vs 18.8% at 3 months (N = 36 vs 26; P < 0.0491), 34.8% vs 29.0% at 6 months (N = 29 vs 17; P < 0.2192), 43.0% vs 40.1% at 12 months (N = 28 vs 12; P < 0.6828), and 36.2% vs 41.7% at 24 months (N = 27 vs 7; P < 0.5553). Average LOS was 2.6 days ± 1.4 for RYGB and 2.8 days ± 1.3 for DS (P < 0.6032). Average procedure length was 134.4 min for RYGB and 189.8 min for DS (P < 0.0001). 30-day readmission rate was 27.5% (N = 11) for RYGB and 14.3% (N = 5) for DS (P < 0.1645). Significant weight loss was observed in both subgroups up to 12 months, with no significant weight loss between 12 and 24 months (RYGB N = 21, P < 0.2961; DS N = 5, P < 0.7233).

conclusionBoth revisional RYGB and revisional DS procedures had significant and sustained weight loss in the first 12 months. There was no significant excess body weight loss difference between revisional RYGB and revisional DS patients at 6, 12, and 24 months, with only significant greater weight loss for RYGB patients at 3 months. Additionally, procedure length was significantly longer for DS compared to RYGB, with no significant differences in LOS and 30-day readmission rates.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassObesity, MorbidGastrectomyHospitals, CommunityHumansReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWeight LossBariatric surgeryDuodenal switchGastric bypassLaparoscopicMorbid obesityRevisional surgery

Identifiers

PMID36197520
PMCPMC9533973
OpenAlexW4302027604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.