Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36197472›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2022

[Legalized deprivation of rights: on the legal construction of dismissal and expulsion under National Socialism].

Michael Martin, Axel Karenberg, Heiner Fangerau

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
54.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael MartinInstitut für Geschichte, Theorie und Ethik der Medizin, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Axel KarenbergInstitut für Geschichte und Ethik der Medizin, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum Köln, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland.
Heiner FangerauInstitut für Geschichte, Theorie und Ethik der Medizin, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland. heiner.fangerau@uni-duesseldorf.de.
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DEUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to provide a deeper understanding of the mechanisms and background leading to the persecution and expulsion, particularly of physicians labelled as "Jewish" in Nazi Germany, this article outlines their gradual disenfranchisement, through laws and decrees in the years 1933-1939. As the publicly visible terror immediately after the Nazi takeover was rejected in large parts of society, the regime resorted early on to supposedly legal forms of exclusion. With the Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service of 7 April 1933, "non-Aryan" (§ 3) and politically unreliable (§ 4) persons could be removed from office, if necessary, even without any further comment (§ 6). However, regulations for long-standing civil servants as well as the "front-line fighter privilege" reduced the desired effect, e.g. in university medicine in a way that was not intended by those in power. The Reich Citizenship Law of 1935, as part of the so-called Nuremberg Laws introduced the criterion of "German blood". This resulted in a second large wave of dismissals. Outside the universities, a plethora of further defamatory legal norms, from the regulation on the approval of physicians for activities with the health insurances and the Law on Honorary Appointments (both in 1933), the so-called Flag Decree (1937) and withdrawal of the approbation (1938), aimed at the gradual "elimination" of Jewish physicians, which for many of them ended in extermination in the Holocaust. This practice implemented over years was based on a jurisdiction devised especially for that purpose and in hindsight it has been perfectly defined as "legal injustice".

Indexed as

HolocaustPhysiciansGermanyHistory, 20th CenturyHumansNational SocialismJewish physiciansLaw for Restoration of the Professional Civil ServiceLegislation and jurisprudenceNational SocialismReich Citizenship Law

Identifiers

PMID36197472
OpenAlexW4302007740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.