Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36197429›Full record

Observational studyRevista brasileira de enfermagem2022

Good practices in central venous catheter maintenance in time of covid-19: an observational study.

Taís Oliveira Dias, Luciana Guimarães Assad, Vanessa Galdino de Paula, Luana Ferreira de Almeida, Erica Brandão de Moraes, Pedro Ruiz Barbosa Nassar

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Taís Oliveira DiasUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4708-0354
Luciana Guimarães AssadUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1134-2279
Vanessa Galdino de PaulaUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7147-5981
Luana Ferreira de AlmeidaUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8433-4160
Erica Brandão de MoraesUniversidade Federal Fluminense. Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3052-158X
Pedro Ruiz Barbosa NassarUniversidade Federal Fluminense. Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9238-0519
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Federal Fluminense · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesto assess adherence to good practices for central venous catheter maintenance by the nursing team during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsobservational, cross-sectional, quantitative research with non-participant observation. Data collection was guided by an instrument developed for this study, consisting of five dimensions. It took place in the intensive care unit of a university hospital in the city of Rio de Janeiro.

resultsa total of 700 observations were carried out, which resulted, in general, in 402 (57.4%) procedures for adherence to good practices. Hand hygiene (8%) and Performing the dressings (10%) were the dimensions with the lowest adherence.

conclusionsgood practices for central venous catheter maintenance were partially present in the routine of the nursing team during the COVID-19 pandemic. In critical moments, intensifying the qualification of the teams for a better adaptation to the new work processes is a strategy to sustain the patient safety culture.

Indexed as

Central Venous CathetersCOVID-19BrazilCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemics

Identifiers

PMID36197429
PMCPMC9728808
OpenAlexW4302275733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.