Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36197393›Full record

ReviewRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2022

Construction and validation of podcast for teen sexual and reproductive health education.

Paloma Loiola Leite, Francisco Ayslan Ferreira Torres, Leonarda Marques Pereira, Adriana de Moraes Bezerra, Lucas Dias Soares Machado, Maria Rocineide Ferreira da Silva

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06891495 (Feasibility and Validity Assessment of an AI-Generated Health Podcast), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06891495 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility and Validity Assessment of an AI-Generated Health Podcast: A Pilot Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorQassim UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsPublic Health, Artificial Intelligence, Feasibility StudiesArmsExpert Evaluation of Adapted Questionnaire, AI-Generated Health Podcast Evaluation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paloma Loiola LeiteUniversidade Regional do Cariri, Departamento de Enfermagem, Iguatu, CE, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2380-8462
Francisco Ayslan Ferreira TorresUniversidade Regional do Cariri, Departamento de Enfermagem, Iguatu, CE, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1703-0025
Leonarda Marques PereiraUniversidade Regional do Cariri, Departamento de Enfermagem, Iguatu, CE, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9820-2038
Adriana de Moraes BezerraUniversidade Regional do Cariri, Departamento de Enfermagem, Iguatu, CE, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0929-4685
Lucas Dias Soares MachadoUniversidade Regional do Cariri, Departamento de Enfermagem, Iguatu, CE, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4450-3796
Maria Rocineide Ferreira da SilvaUniversidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6086-6901

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveto construe and validate a podcast for teen sexual and reproductive health education.

methoda methodological study was conducted based on Freire's perspective. The podcast was construed based on the Knowledge about Sexuality Questionnaire applied to 60 adolescents and an integrative literature review. Eleven experts conducted the validation process. Internal consistency was evaluated using Item-level Content Validity Index ≥0.78 and Cronbach's alpha ≥0.700.

resultsfour podcast episodes were produced with the adolescents' participation using the radio play format, addressing sex and sexuality, contraceptive methods, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) and other sexually transmitted infections. The podcast episodes last between 8 and 11 minutes and was validated with Item-level Content Validity Index = 0.87 and Cronbach's alpha = 0.951.

conclusionthe podcast was validated for teen sexual and reproductive health education and constitutes a tool for health professional practices, particularly nurses, as well as autonomous use by adolescents. (1) Adolescents helped construct the technology. (2) Podcast is an easy-to-access, low-cost educational resource. (3) The radio play format emulates the target audience’s style and language. (4) The podcast format is little used by nursing, especially in health education. (5) The unpublished and judge-validated podcast is available for free.

Indexed as

Reproductive HealthSexually Transmitted DiseasesAdolescentContraceptionHumansSex EducationSexual Behavior

Identifiers

PMID36197393
PMCPMC9647944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.