Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36197371›Full record

Observational studyRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo2022

Adverse events following immunization of elderly with COVID-19 inactivated virus vaccine (CoronaVac) in Southeastern Brazil: an active surveillance study.

Karina Takesaki Miyaji, Lucas Yuji Umesaki Itto, Lucas Caue Jacintho, Amanda Caroline Ribeiro Sales, Marcel Hiratsuka, Fabio Campos Leonel, Keila Tomoko Higa-Taniguchi, Camila Melo Picone, Amanda Nazareth Lara, Camila Cristina Martini Rodrigues and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karina Takesaki MiyajiUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Centro de Referência para Imunobiológicos Especiais, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2653-3975
Lucas Yuji Umesaki IttoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2377-9884
Lucas Caue JacinthoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1510-0218
Amanda Caroline Ribeiro SalesUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Centro de Referência para Imunobiológicos Especiais, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3675-1573
Marcel HiratsukaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Clínica Médica - Geriatria, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0347-5901
Fabio Campos LeonelUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Clínica Médica - Geriatria, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8547-5536
Keila Tomoko Higa-TaniguchiUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Clínica Médica - Geriatria, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9314-1333
Camila Melo PiconeUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Moléstias Infecciosas e Parasitárias, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2455-5831
Amanda Nazareth LaraUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Centro de Referência para Imunobiológicos Especiais, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4294-0282
Camila Cristina Martini RodriguesUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Centro de Referência para Imunobiológicos Especiais, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5340-5886
Marta Heloisa LopesUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Centro de Referência para Imunobiológicos Especiais, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5236-6248
Ana Marli Christovam SartoriUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Centro de Referência para Imunobiológicos Especiais, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3777-0757
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare workers, the elderly and other vulnerable populations were the first to receive COVID-19 vaccines in public health programs. There were few vaccine safety data available on the elderly. This observational study aimed to evaluate the inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) safety in the elderly, at the beginning of the vaccination program, in Sao Paulo city, Brazil. The elderly people that received CoronaVac at the Reference Center for Special Immunobiologicals (CRIE) or at home, administered by the Interdisciplinary Home Care Team (NADI) of the Hospital das Clinicas were invited to participate in this phase 4 observational study. The vaccination schedule included two CoronaVac doses 28 days apart. The information on solicited and unsolicited adverse events following immunization were collected by phone calls on days 4 and 8 after each vaccine dose. We enrolled 158 adults aged 65 to 101 years (mean of 84.1 years); 63.9% were females and 95.6% had chronic conditions, 21.5% had moderate or severe impairment in daily living activities; 34.2% were pre-frail and 19.6% were frail. We were able to contact 95.6% and 91.6% of the vaccinated people, after the first and second doses, respectively; 31.8% and 23.4% of the contacted participants reported some adverse events (AE) following the first and second doses, respectively. Pain at the injection site, fatigue, myalgia and headaches were the most frequent solicited AE. Most AE were mild to moderate. There were eight severe adverse events, but none of them were considered related to the vaccine. The CoronaVac was safe and well tolerated by these adults of advanced age with frailty and comorbidities.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdultAgedAntibodies, ViralBrazilFemaleHumansMaleVaccinationVaccines, InactivatedWatchful WaitingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID36197371
PMCPMC9529211
OpenAlexW4302275967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.