Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36197370›Full record

Observational studyRevista Brasileira de terapia intensiva2022

Success factors of a collaborative project to reduce healthcare-associated infections in intensive care units in Northeastern Brazil.

Ladjane Santos Wolmer de Melo, Thaís Moreira Estevão, Juliana Sousa de Castro Chaves, Janaina Maria Silva Vieira, Marialba de Morais Siqueira, Iêda Ludmer Guedes Alcoforado, Cláudia Fernanda de Lacerda Vidal, Heloisa Ramos Lacerda

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ladjane Santos Wolmer de MeloHospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - Recife (PE), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2996-4172
Thaís Moreira EstevãoHospital Universitário Oswaldo Cruz, Universidade de Pernambuco - Recife (PE), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9850-7747
Juliana Sousa de Castro ChavesPronto-Socorro Cardiológico de Pernambuco, Universidade de Pernambuco - Recife (PE), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1372-9373
Janaina Maria Silva VieiraHospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - Recife (PE), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5910-0514
Marialba de Morais SiqueiraHospital Metropolitano Oeste Pelópidas Silveira - Recife (PE), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8120-9356
Iêda Ludmer Guedes AlcoforadoHospital Getúlio Vargas, Secretaria Estadual de Saúde de Pernambuco - Recife (PE), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0194-2043
Cláudia Fernanda de Lacerda VidalHospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - Recife (PE), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0619-8375
Heloisa Ramos LacerdaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Medicina Tropical, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - Recife (PE), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9872-7571

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the implementation and results of the collaborative PROADI-SUS project by the Brazilian Ministry of Health to reduce healthcare-associated infections: ventilator-associated pneumonia, primary central line-associated bloodstream infection and catheter-associated urinary tract infections.

methodsThis was a prospective observational study that investigated the implementation stages and outcomes during 18 months in five intensive care units in the city of Recife. Reductions in healthcare-associated infections in each unit were calculated using previous medians compared to those of the study period.

resultsThe goal of reducing the three healthcare-associated infections, i.e., 30% in 18 months, was achieved in at least one of the healthcare-associated infections and was also achieved for two healthcare-associated infections in two hospitals and three healthcare-associated infections in just one hospital; the latter reached the target of 36 months. Implementing the bundles and monitoring the results by the professionals were considered essential actions by the local management teams. In addition, the acquisition of supplies and their availability alongside the beds, signage, checklists, staff awareness, adaptation, team building, training and celebration of achievements were assessed as being relevant for reducing healthcare-associated infections.

conclusionThe collaborative approach reduced healthcare-associated infections, despite partial adherence to the bundles. The hypothesis is that success is related to the project methodology and motivated multidisciplinary teams, especially nursing teams.

Indexed as

Catheter-Related InfectionsCross InfectionPneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedUrinary Tract InfectionsBrazilDelivery of Health CareHumansIntensive Care Units

Identifiers

PMID36197370
PMCPMC9749087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.