Observational studyMedicine2022
Compliance and effect of thickener use in dysphagia patients with brain lesions: An observational pilot study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Application of Thickened Liquids to Treat Adults With Neurogenic Dysphagia.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
- Understanding constipation in stroke patients with dysphagia: incidence, risk factors, and management strategies-a scoping review.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study aimed to investigate the status of thickener use in dysphagia patients with brain lesions and incidence of adverse events based on fluid viscosity. Twenty dysphagia patients with brain lesions who were recommended to use thickeners following a videofluoroscopic swallowing study were enrolled in this observational pilot study. Patients were educated to use thickener as level 2 or 3 based on the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative flow test. We evaluated the viscosity of the fluid that patients drank once a week for 2 weeks, and reviewed medical records regarding adverse events. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the average value obtained from the viscosity evaluations as thin (Levels 0-2) and thick fluid groups (Levels 3-4). Adverse events were compared between the groups. The number of patients who did not follow the recommendations increased from 35.0 to 45.0% during the 1-week follow-up period. No patient developed pneumonia or urinary tract infection. Constipation (P = 0.338) and dehydration status (P = 0.202) were not significantly different between the 2 groups. In 2 evaluations for 20 patients, 40.0% of the cases did not follow the educated viscosity, and the number gradually increased in the follow-up evaluation. Considering that there were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse effects including pneumonia according to the fluid viscosity, a further study is necessary to establish detailed criteria for thickener use in dysphagia patients with brain lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.