ReviewMedicine2022
Cardiovascular disease in women: A review of spontaneous coronary artery dissection.
Review in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chronic Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in a Young Woman Managed With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Case Report With Literature Review.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Maternal Cardiovascular Emergencies During Pregnancy and the Puerperium: Current Diagnostic Approach and Management.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Enrollment of all-female and lactating or pregnant female participants in cardiovascular trials.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2025Article
- Myocardial Infarction in Young Adults: A Case Series and Comprehensive Review of Molecular and Clinical Mechanisms.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Prognostic value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio for cardiovascular diseases: research progress.American journal of translational research · 2025Review
- The Role of Psychosocial Stress on Cardiovascular Disease in Women: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2024Review
- Review
- Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2024Review
- Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in women in the generative period: clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcome-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
- A review of the risk and precipitating factors for spontaneous coronary artery dissection.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Contemporary review on spontaneous coronary artery dissection: insights into the angiographic finding and differential diagnosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- The sex-dependent response to psychosocial stress and ischaemic heart disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research has demonstrated the disproportionate quality of care for women with cardiovascular disease. These findings have prompted a renewed focus on cardiovascular disease awareness and disease prevention in women. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a significant cause of myocardial infarction (MI) and sudden death that primarily affects women. ongoing research has led to improved diagnostic capabilities and changes in approaches to initial and long-term management most importantly this research has provided evidence that SCAD is more common than previously thought and must be evaluated and treated differently from atherosclerotic MI. The difference between SCAD and atherosclerotic MI is highlighted in high rates of recurrent disease, gender distribution, association with exogenous hormones, pregnancy, migraine, physical and emotional stress triggers, concurrent systemic arteriopathies, and connective tissue disease. In this review, we provide updated insights and a summary of the epidemiology, risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment options, prognosis, and recurrence prevention of SCAD. We aim to provide a review of SCAD as a focus on cardiovascular disease awareness and disease prevention in women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.