Observational studyMedicine2022
The thickness of erector spinae muscles can be easily measured by computed tomography for the assessment of physical activity: An observational study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fetal Pathogenesis of Scoliosis Suggested by Asymmetry of Gene Expression in Paravertebral Muscles.JOR spine · 2026Article
- Erector spinae muscle characteristics predict 90-day survival in elderly pneumonia patients.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Muscle and Fat Composition in OSA: A CT-Based Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Potential role of serological biomarkers in the diagnosis and prediction of community-acquired pneumonia in elderly individuals.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Comparison of the thickness of the erector spinae muscles between aspiration pneumonia and bacterial pneumonia patients.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2023Article
- Clinically defined aspiration pneumonia is an independent risk factor associated with long-term hospital stay: a prospective cohort study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The loss of muscle mass and changes in muscle composition are important factors for assessing skeletal muscle dysfunction. The cross-sectional area (CSA) of muscle is usually used to assess skeletal muscle function. However, the CSA of skeletal muscle can be difficult for clinicians to measure because a specific 3D image analysis system for computed tomography (CT) scans is needed. Therefore, we conducted a study to develop a new method of easily assessing physical activity, in which the thickness of the erector spinae muscles (ESMT) was measured by CT, and to compare ESMT to the CSA of the erector spinae muscles (ESMCSA) in patients with nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) pulmonary infections who underwent surgery after some preoperative examinations, such as laboratory tests, chest CT scans, spirometry, and 6-minute walk tests (6MWT). We retrospectively studied adult patients with NTM pulmonary infections who underwent a lobectomy at Fukujuji Hospital from April 2010 to March 2016. We assessed the correlations between ESMT and different variables, including ESMCSA. Sixty-one patients with NTM pulmonary infections were included. The median ESMT and ESMCSA were 1371 mm2 (IQR 1178-1784 mm2) and 28.5 mm (IQR 25.4-31.7 mm), respectively, and a very strong linear correlation was observed between ESMT and ESMCSA (R = 0.858, P < .001). ESMT and ESMCSA were positively associated with body weight (ESMT: R = 0.540, P < .001, ESMCSA: R = 0.714, P < .001), body mass index (ESMT: R = 0.421, P < .001, ESMCSA: R = 0.560, P < .001), the 6MWT value (ESMT: R = 0.413, P = .040, ESMCSA: R = 0.503, P = .010), vital capacity (ESMT: R = 0.527, P < .001, ESMCSA: R = 0.577, P < .001), and the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ESMT: R = 0.460, P < .001, ESMCSA: R = 0.532, P < .001). We demonstrated that compared to ESMCSA, ESMT is easily measured by CT and can be a useful parameter for clinically evaluating physical activity. Furthermore, ESMT and ESMCSA were related to physical activity, as measured by the 6MWT and spirometry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.