ArticleMedicine2022
A nomogram for predicting overall survival rate in patients with brain metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning models based on XGBoost algorithm to predict prognosis of lung cancer brain metastases.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Survival Predictive Nomograms for Non-Surgical Brain Metastases Patients From Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Radiotherapy: A Population-Based Study.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose was to develop a nomogram for the prediction of the 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates in patients with brain metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (BMNSCLC). Patients were collected from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results program (SEER) and classified into the training and validation groups. Several independent prognostic factors identified by statistical methods were incorporated to establish a predictive nomogram. The concordance index (C-index), the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), and calibration curve were applied to estimate predictive ability of the nomogram. To compare the clinical practicability of the nomogram and TNM staging system by decision curve analysis (DCA). A total of 24,164 eligible patients were collected and assigned into the training (n = 16,916) and validation groups (n = 7248). Based on the prognostic factors, we developed a nomogram with good discriminative ability. The C-indices for training and validation group were 0.727 and 0.728. The AUCs of 1- and 2-year OS rates were both 0.8, and the calibration curves also demonstrated good performance of the nomogram. DCA illustrated that the nomogram provided clinical net benefit compared with the TNM staging system. We developed a predictive nomogram for more accurate and comprehensive prediction of OS in BMNSCLC patients, which can be a useful and convenient tool for clinicians to make proper clinical decisions, and adjust follow-up management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.