ReviewMedicine2022
Sorsby fundus dystrophy (SFD): A narrative review.
Review in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retinal Imaging Findings in Inherited Retinal Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Disease-CausingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Angioid Streaks Remain a Challenge in Diagnosis, Management, and Treatment.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- How to Set Up Genetic Counselling for Inherited Macular Dystrophies: Focus on Genetic Characterization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Deglycosylation Increases the Aggregation and Angiogenic Properties of Mutant Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase 3 Protein: Implications for Sorsby Fundus Dystrophy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sorsby fundus dystrophy (SFD) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder with complete penetrance affecting the macula. This is caused by a mutation in the TIMP-3. This objective narrative review aims to provide an overview of the pathophysiology, current treatment modalities, and future perspectives. A literature search was performed using "PubMed," "Web of Science," "Scopus," "ScienceDirect," "Google Scholar," "medRxiv," and "bioRxiv." The molecular mechanisms underlying SFD are not completely understood. Novel advancements in cell culture techniques, including induced pluripotent stem cells, may enable more reliable modeling of SFD. These cell culture techniques aim to shed more light on the pathophysiology of SFD, and hopefully, this may lead to the future development of treatment strategies for SFD. Currently, no gene therapy is available. The main treatment is the use of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF) to treat secondary choroidal neovascular membrane (CNV), which is a major complication observed in this condition. If CNV is detected and treated promptly, patients with SFD have a good chance of maintaining a functional central vision. Other treatment modalities have been tried but have shown limited benefit, and therefore, have not managed to be more widely accepted. In summary, although there is no definitive cure yet, the use of anti-VEGF treatment for secondary CNV has provided the opportunity to maintain functional vision in individuals with SFD, provided CNV is detected and treated early.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.