ArticleMedicine2022
Efficacy and safety of different doses of baricitinib for rheumatoid arthritis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of baricitinib with different dosages in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
methodsPubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were retrieved by computer to gather randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of baricitinib for RA from their beginning to September 2021. After 2 researchers independently screened the literature and extracted the data, the risk of bias of included RCTs was assessed, and Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed by GeMTC0.14.3 and Stata15.1 software.
resultsTen publications reporting 9 RCTs were included, with 4129 patients randomized to receive 1 of the 7 interventions. Seven interventions were baricitinib 1 mg + conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARD), baricitinib 2 mg + cDMARD, baricitinib 4 mg + cDMARD, baricitinib 8 mg + cDMARD, baricitinib 4 mg, placebo + cDMARD, and cDMARD. In the efficacy outcomes at 12 weeks, nearly all doses of baricitinib with or without cDMARD were superior to placebo plus cDMARD and baricitinib 8 mg combined with cDMARD might have the best curative effect in most outcomes. In the efficacy outcomes at 24 weeks, all doses of baricitinib with or without cDMARD were superior to placebo plus cDMARD and baricitinib 4 mg monotherapy might have the best curative effect in most outcomes. The intervention with the highest incidence of adverse events (AEs) might be baricitinib 8 mg combined with cDMARD, and the intervention with the highest incidence of infections might be baricitinib 4 mg combined with cDMARD.
conclusionsBaricitinib 8 mg combined with cDMARDs was suitable for short-term control of RA symptoms, and baricitinib 4 mg was more effective for treating RA over a longer period of time. But attention should be paid for the risk of baricitinib at 4 to 8 mg in clinical application due to the high incidence of AEs and infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.