Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36197145›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of urology2022

Robotic Local Fat Extirpation and Ureteric Reimplantation for Pelvic Lipomatosis with Ureteric Obstruction: Technical Considerations.

Mallikarjuna Chiruvella, Ghouse Mohammed Syed, Shanti Darga, Purnachandra Reddy Kondakindi, Bhavatej Enganti, Rajesh Kumar Reddy Adapala

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mallikarjuna ChiruvellaDepartment of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, India.
Ghouse Mohammed SyedDepartment of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, India.
Shanti DargaDepartment of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, India.
Purnachandra Reddy KondakindiDepartment of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, India.
Bhavatej EngantiDepartment of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, India.
Rajesh Kumar Reddy AdapalaDepartment of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, India.
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUreteric reimplantation is the treatment of choice for pelvic lipomatosis with ureteric obstruction. Pelvic adherent fat poses a technical challenge during this surgery. DESCRIPTION OF TECHNIQUE: We describe the robotic approach to facilitate the precise dissection of the ureter and bladder in adherent fat. After creating pneumoperitoneum and port placement, the ureter is exposed at the iliac crossing and dissected distally. Perivesical fat at the intended site of ureteric reimplantation is excised and cystotomy is done. Ureterovesical anastomosis is performed over a stent. PATIENTS AND

methodsTwo patients with pelvic lipomatosis causing ureteric obstruction and renal function impairment underwent robotic ureteric reimplantation at our institute. Technical aspects and outcomes are discussed here.

resultsBlood loss was minimal. No intra-operative or post-operative complication was noted. Renal function improved for both patients.

conclusionRobotic approach helps to overcome the technical difficulties posed by adherent fat during ureteric reimplantation in pelvic lipomatosis.

Identifiers

PMID36197145
PMCPMC9623349
OpenAlexW4300960465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.