Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36197125›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2022

Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors toward COVID-19 vaccination in a sample of Italian healthcare workers.

Luca Regazzi, Eleonora Marziali, Alberto Lontano, Leonardo Villani, Andrea Paladini, Giovanna Elisa Calabrò, Patrizia Laurenti, Walter Ricciardi, Chiara Cadeddu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luca RegazziSection of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Eleonora MarzialiSection of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Alberto LontanoSection of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Leonardo VillaniSection of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Andrea PaladiniSection of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Giovanna Elisa CalabròSection of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Patrizia LaurentiSection of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Walter RicciardiSection of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Chiara CadedduSection of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy in healthcare workers (HCWs) has been studied for various contagious diseases, but there is still insufficient knowledge about this phenomenon for COVID-19. We developed and validated a knowledge, attitude, and practice survey of 39 questions to assess Italian HCWs' hesitancy toward vaccination in general (general hesitancy), COVID-19 vaccination (COVID-19 hesitancy), and public health injunctive measures (refusal of obligations). The survey was administered through a web platform between July and November 2021. Three multivariable logistic regressions were performed to evaluate the association between the explored dimensions of hesitancy and the potential determinants investigated. Out of 2,132 respondents with complete answers, 17.0% showed to be generally hesitancy toward vaccination, 32.3% were hesitant on COVID-19 vaccination, while 18.8% were categorized as refusing obligations. A significant protective effect against all three dimensions of hesitancy was found for increasing fear of COVID-19, advising COVID-19 vaccination to relatives and patients, having received flu vaccination in the previous year and having higher levels of education. Better self-rated knowledge about COVID-19 vaccines and reading up institutional sources were significantly protective against general and COVID-19 hesitancy, while being a physician rather than another healthcare professional was protective only against COVID-19 hesitancy. Conversely, increasing age and referring to colleagues to expand knowledge about COVID-19 were positively associated with COVID-19 hesitancy. The determinants of general hesitancy, COVID-19 hesitancy and the refusal of obligations are mostly overlapping. Given the great influence they exert on patients and communities, it is pivotal to limit HCWs vaccine hesitancy through appropriate training activities.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansKnowledgeVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19Covid-19 vaccineshealth knowledge and attitudeshealth personnelItalyphysicianssurveys and questionnairesvaccinationvaccination hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36197125
PMCPMC9746397
OpenAlexW4302004358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.