ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2022
Embodied decisions during walking.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- How visual context influences lateral stepping regulation while walking on winding paths.Journal of neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Gaze and gait dynamics are shaped by terrain type during urban walking.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Exploiting prior knowledge in continuous decision-making under uncertainty: the case of tennis experts.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- Near-gaze fixation promotes use of spin turns during walking: age-independent visuomotor effects with maladaptive behavioral consequences in older adults.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Humans take into account the consequences of motor control demands when making perceptual decisions between actions.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Embodied decisions as active inference.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Reaching Distance Influences Perceptual Decisions.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- The interplay between motor cost and self-efficacy related to walking across terrain in gaze and walking decisions.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Biomechanical costs influence decisions made during ongoing actions.Journal of neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Dual-tasking modulates movement speed but not value-based choices during walking.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Impact of Prescribed Exercise on the Physical and Cognitive Health of Adults with Down Syndrome: The MinDSets Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Embodied decision biases: individually stable across different tasks?Experimental brain research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research on embodied decision-making only recently started to examine whether and how concurrent actions influence value-based decisions. For instance, during walking humans preferably make decisions that align with a turn toward the side of their current swing leg, sometimes resulting in unfavorable choices (e.g., less reward). It is suggested that concurrent movements influence decision-making by coincidental changes in motor costs. If this is true, systematic manipulations of motor costs should bias decisions. To test this, participants had to accumulate rewards (i.e., points) by walking and turning toward left and right targets displaying rewards across three experiments. In
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.