Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36196649›Full record

ReviewObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2022

Withdrawal: A key consideration in evaluating whether highly processed foods are addictive.

Lindsey Parnarouskis, Adam M Leventhal, Stuart G Ferguson, Ashley N Gearhardt

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The battle over "food addiction".Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Food Addiction.Brain sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Withdrawal: A key consideration in evaluating whether highly processed foods are addictive.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lindsey ParnarouskisDepartment of Psychology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9208-0516
Adam M LeventhalInstitute for Addiction Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Stuart G FergusonTasmanian School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Ashley N GearhardtDepartment of Psychology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
University of Michigan · USUniversity of Southern California · USUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

Tobacco Use Treatment Research for Vulnerable PopulationsK24DA048160 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Adam Matthew Leventhal · 2019 to 2026
$1.4M
NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA048160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers are currently debating whether theories of addiction explain compulsive overeating of highly processed (HP) foods (i.e., industrially created foods high in refined carbohydrates and/or fat), which contributes to obesity and diet-related disease. A subset of individuals consumes HP foods with behavioral phenotypes that mirror substance use disorders. Withdrawal, the emergence of aversive physical and psychological symptoms upon reduction or cessation of substance use, is a core component of addiction that was central to historical debates about other substances' addictive potential (e.g., nicotine and cocaine). However, no one has systematically considered evidence for whether HP foods cause withdrawal, which represents a key knowledge gap regarding the utility of addiction models for understanding compulsive overeating. Thus, we reviewed evidence for whether animals and humans exhibit withdrawal when reducing or eliminating HP food intake. Controlled experimental evidence indicates animals experience HP food withdrawal marked by neural reward changes and behaviors consistent with withdrawal from other addictive substances. In humans, preliminary evidence supports subjective withdrawal-like experiences. However, most current human research is limited to retrospective recall. Further experimental research is needed to evaluate this construct. We outline future research directions to investigate HP food withdrawal in humans and consider potential clinical implications.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveCocaineSubstance-Related DisordersAnimalsCarbohydratesFast FoodsFeeding BehaviorHumansHyperphagiaNicotineRetrospective StudiesCarbohydratesCocaineNicotineaddictionfood addictionsubstance use disorderswithdrawal

Identifiers

PMID36196649
PMCPMC9786266
OpenAlexW4301585796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.