Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36196582›Full record

ArticleBone & joint open2022

Coxa valga and antetorta increases differences among different femoral version measurements : potential implications for derotational femoral osteotomy planning.

Florian Schmaranzer, Malin K Meier, Till D Lerch, Andreas Hecker, Simon D Steppacher, Eduardo N Novais, Ata M Kiapour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Influence of limb position on femoral neck anteversion angle measurement during computed tomography imaging.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2025
    Article
  7. Computed tomography-based automated 3D measurement of femoral version: Validation against standard 2D measurements in symptomatic patients.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. [Femoroacetabular impingement in adolescents].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Florian SchmaranzerDepartment of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Malin K MeierDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Till D LerchDepartment of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Andreas HeckerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Simon D SteppacherDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Eduardo N NovaisDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ata M KiapourDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7742-5769

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo evaluate how abnormal proximal femoral anatomy affects different femoral version measurements in young patients with hip pain.

methodsFirst, femoral version was measured in 50 hips of symptomatic consecutively selected patients with hip pain (mean age 20 years (SD 6), 60% (n = 25) females) on preoperative CT scans using different measurement methods: Lee et al, Reikerås et al, Tomczak et al, and Murphy et al. Neck-shaft angle (NSA) and α angle were measured on coronal and radial CT images. Second, CT scans from three patients with femoral retroversion, normal femoral version, and anteversion were used to create 3D femur models, which were manipulated to generate models with different NSAs and different cam lesions, resulting in eight models per patient. Femoral version measurements were repeated on manipulated femora.

resultsComparing the different measurement methods for femoral version resulted in a maximum mean difference of 18° (95% CI 16 to 20) between the most proximal (Lee et al) and most distal (Murphy et al) methods. Higher differences in proximal and distal femoral version measurement techniques were seen in femora with greater femoral version (

conclusionMeasurement of femoral version angles differ depending on the method used to almost 20°, which is in the range of the aimed surgical correction in derotational femoral osteotomy and thus can be considered clinically relevant. Differences between proximal and distal measurement methods further increase by increasing femoral version and NSA. Measurement methods that take the entire proximal femur into account by using distal landmarks may produce more sensitive measurements of these differences.Cite this article:

Indexed as

Coxa valgaCT scansfemoraFemoral acetabular impingementFemoral derotational osteotomyfemoral osteotomiesfemoral retroversionFemoral versionHip joint preserving surgeryhip painhipsneck shaft anglesproximal femur

Identifiers

PMID36196582
PMCPMC9626866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.