ArticleBone & joint open2022
Coxa valga and antetorta increases differences among different femoral version measurements : potential implications for derotational femoral osteotomy planning.
Article in Bone & joint open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The lesser trochanter index: detection of increased femoral version in patients with symptomatic hip disease.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- The Modified Budin View: A Reliable and Accessible Screening Tool for Femoral Version Deformities in Joint-Preserving Hip Surgery.The American journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Deep-Learning System for Automatic Measurement of the Femorotibial Rotational Angle on Lower-Extremity Computed Tomography.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Exploring the Relationship Between Femoral Neck Torsion Angle and Anteversion Angle Through Three-Dimensional Reconstruction in a Fixed Coordinate System.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Influence of limb position on femoral neck anteversion angle measurement during computed tomography imaging.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2025Article
- Computed tomography-based automated 3D measurement of femoral version: Validation against standard 2D measurements in symptomatic patients.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2024Article
- Coxa valga and antetorta configuration leads to underestimation of the femoral component size: a matched case-control study of patients undergoing cementless total hip arthroplasty.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- [Femoroacetabular impingement in adolescents].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- [Preoperative MR imaging for hip dysplasia : Assessment of associated deformities and intraarticular pathologies].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo evaluate how abnormal proximal femoral anatomy affects different femoral version measurements in young patients with hip pain.
methodsFirst, femoral version was measured in 50 hips of symptomatic consecutively selected patients with hip pain (mean age 20 years (SD 6), 60% (n = 25) females) on preoperative CT scans using different measurement methods: Lee et al, Reikerås et al, Tomczak et al, and Murphy et al. Neck-shaft angle (NSA) and α angle were measured on coronal and radial CT images. Second, CT scans from three patients with femoral retroversion, normal femoral version, and anteversion were used to create 3D femur models, which were manipulated to generate models with different NSAs and different cam lesions, resulting in eight models per patient. Femoral version measurements were repeated on manipulated femora.
resultsComparing the different measurement methods for femoral version resulted in a maximum mean difference of 18° (95% CI 16 to 20) between the most proximal (Lee et al) and most distal (Murphy et al) methods. Higher differences in proximal and distal femoral version measurement techniques were seen in femora with greater femoral version (
conclusionMeasurement of femoral version angles differ depending on the method used to almost 20°, which is in the range of the aimed surgical correction in derotational femoral osteotomy and thus can be considered clinically relevant. Differences between proximal and distal measurement methods further increase by increasing femoral version and NSA. Measurement methods that take the entire proximal femur into account by using distal landmarks may produce more sensitive measurements of these differences.Cite this article:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.