Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36196464›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2022

The role of renal nerve stimulation in percutaneous renal denervation for hypertension: A mini-review.

Hui-Chun Huang, Hao-Min Cheng, Yook-Chin Chia, Yan Li, Huynh Van Minh, Saulat Siddique, Apichard Sukonthasarn, Jam Chin Tay, Yuda Turana, Narsingh Verma and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Renal Denervation in Cardiovascular Diseases: Mechanisms, Evidence, and Expanding Applications.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Sympathetic Nervous System and Atherosclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 11 institutions in 9 countries.

Hui-Chun HuangCardiovascular Center and Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hao-Min ChengDepartment of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Medical Education and Research, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-3885-6600
Yook-Chin ChiaDepartment of Medical Sciences, School of Healthcare and Medical Sciences, Sunway University, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-1995-0359
Yan LiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Hypertension, State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, National Research Centre for Translational Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5825-5968
Huynh Van MinhDepartment of Cardiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Thua Thien-Hue, Vietnam.
Saulat SiddiqueDepartment of Cardiology, Fatima Memorial Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-1294-0430
Apichard SukonthasarnCardiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-7569-9563
Jam Chin TayDepartment of General Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-7657-4383
Yuda TuranaFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-4527-0285
Narsingh VermaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0348-7419
Kazuomi KarioDepartment of Physiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8251-4480
Tzung-Dau WangCardiovascular Center and Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7180-3607
Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia · IDChiang Mai University · THHue University · VNJichi Medical University · JPKing George's Medical University · INNational Taiwan University · TWNational Taiwan University Hospital · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWRuijin Hospital · CNTan Tock Seng Hospital · SGUniversity of Malaya · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of percutaneous renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) for blood pressure (BP)-lowering in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Nevertheless, major challenges exist, such as the wide variation of BP-lowering responses following RDN (from strong response to no response) and lack of feasible and reproducible peri-procedural predictors for patient response. Both animal and human studies have demonstrated different patterns of BP responses following renal nerve stimulation (RNS), possibly related to varied regional proportions of sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve tissues along the renal arteries. Animal studies of RNS have shown that rapid electrical stimulation of the renal arteries caused renal artery vasoconstriction and increased norepinephrine secretion with a concomitant increase in BP, and the responses were attenuated after RDN. Moreover, selective RDN at sites with strong RNS-induced BP increases led to a more efficient BP-lowering effect. In human, when RNS was performed before and after RDN, blunted changes in RNS-induced BP responses were noted after RDN. The systolic BP response induced by RNS before RDN and blunted systolic BP response to RNS after RDN, at the site with maximal RNS-induced systolic BP response before RDN, both correlated with the 24-h ambulatory BP reductions 3-12 months following RDN. In summary, RNS-induced BP changes, before and after RDN, could be used to assess the immediate effect of RDN and predict BP reductions months following RDN. More comprehensive, large-scale and long term trials are needed to verify these findings.

Indexed as

HypertensionAnimalsBlood PressureDenervationHumansKidneyNorepinephrineSympathectomyTreatment OutcomeNorepinephrinehypertensionpercutaneous renal sympathetic denervationrenal nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36196464
PMCPMC9532907
OpenAlexW4301401615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.