Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36196441›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2022

Antibiotic prescribing amongst South African general practitioners in private practice: an analysis of a health insurance database.

Mobolaji Eniola Alabi, Sabiha Yusuf Essack

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Utilisation of antibiotics in a community pharmacy: A case from north-west, South Africa.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Antibiotic prescribing in public primary healthcare centres in Maseru, Lesotho.Southern African journal of infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Changes in the Appropriateness of US Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing After the COVID-19 Outbreak: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis of 2016-2021 Data.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mobolaji Eniola AlabiAntimicrobial Research Unit, College of Health Sciences, University of Kwa-Zulu, Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4478-0534
Sabiha Yusuf EssackAntimicrobial Research Unit, College of Health Sciences, University of Kwa-Zulu, Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3357-2761
University of KwaZulu-Natal · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing among GPs in the private primary healthcare sector in South Africa. Methods: An anonymized national database of claims for antibiotic prescriptions was obtained from a large medical insurer. Antibiotic prescriptions were categorized based on International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes as 'appropriate', 'potentially appropriate' and 'inappropriate' using a classification scheme developed by Chua Results: In February 2018, 188 141 antibiotics were prescribed for 174 889 patients who consulted GPs in the private sector. Penicillins were the most frequently prescribed antibiotic class, making up 40.7% of all antibiotics prescribed. Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid was the most frequently prescribed antibiotic, making up 28.6% of all antibiotics prescribed. Diseases of the respiratory system generated the highest number of prescriptions, making up 46.1% of all diagnoses. Of all prescriptions, 8.8% were appropriate, 32.0% were potentially appropriate, 45.4% were inappropriate and 13.8% could not be assessed. Of the appropriately and potentially appropriately prescribed antibiotics, 30.8% were correct antibiotic selections. Of the correctly selected antibiotics for adults, 57.7% had correct doses. Of the antibiotics prescribed with correct doses for adults, 76.7% had correct dosage frequencies and durations of treatment. Conclusions: The study revealed that antibiotics were frequently prescribed inappropriately by GPs in the private primary healthcare sector. There is thus a need to develop stewardship interventions in the sector.

Identifiers

PMID36196441
PMCPMC9524566
OpenAlexW4298111544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.