ArticleCureus2022
Glycosylated Hemoglobin as an Independent Prognostic Marker in COVID-19 Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective The main objective of this study is to analyze the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among patients with diabetes mellitus using glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as a prognostic marker in predicting the outcome among these individuals. Methods This was a retrospective, observational study conducted in a tertiary care center during the first and second waves of COVID-19 in Salem, Tamil Nadu, for a period of one year (September 2020-September 2021). Numerous variables, including socio-demographic data, vitals, laboratory and radiological investigations, and end variables like mortality and morbidity due to COVID-19, were studied. Results Out of the 754 people admitted, 253 were diabetic, among which only 65 individuals fulfilled the criteria for participation. Among the 65 patients in the study, 21 had mild disease, 28 had moderate disease, among whom, two patients had HbA1c less than 7, 10 had between 7 and 8, 11 had between 8 and 10, and five had above 10, and 16 had severe disease, among whom one patient had HbA1c less than 7, 4 between 7 and 8, seven between 8 and 10, and four above 10. This was statistically significant (0.005). Conclusion The incidence of mortality was high among patients with prolonged uncontrolled diabetes mellitus with high HbA1c and among patients presenting diabetic complications like diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), euglycemic ketoacidosis, and hyperglycemic hyperosmolar syndrome (HHS).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.