Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36196309›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Crash Course in Orthopaedics: Development and Evaluation of a 12-Week Online Trauma and Orthopaedics Teaching Program for Medical Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Catherine James, Karen Chui, Alex Brown, Arwel Poacher, Claire Carpenter, Edwin Jesudason

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Student Perspectives on the Efficacy of Hybrid Simulation Laboratory Teaching-Practicing Modules.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine JamesOrthopaedics, Cardiff & Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, GBR.
Karen ChuiOrthopaedic Surgery, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, GBR.
Alex BrownOrthopaedic Surgery, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, GBR.
Arwel PoacherOrthopaedics, Cardiff & Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, GBR.
Claire CarpenterOrthopaedics, Cardiff & Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, GBR.
Edwin JesudasonOrthopedic Surgery, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, GBR.
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board · GBRoyal National Orthopaedic Hospital · GBBetsi Cadwaladr University Health Board · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruption in clinical placements of medical students in the United Kingdom (UK), including trauma and orthopaedic surgery (T&O) rotations. Based on the British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) undergraduate syllabus, a 12-week online teaching program was designed to supplement T&O teaching for medical students across the UK while lockdown and social-distancing restrictions were in place. This study aims to describe the process of designing an online teaching program, evaluate the effectiveness of online education, explore medical student perceptions of the virtual learning environment, and report the lessons learned from this 12-week online program. Methods The "Crash Course in Orthopaedics" consisted of 12 webinars, with topics covering a range of acute and chronic T&O conditions, and was delivered through the online platform Zoom. Attendees were invited to complete a post-course questionnaire retrospectively and the results were used in this study. Qualitative data was assessed using thematic analysis. Quantitative data were presented as descriptive statistics.  Results The webinar series was attended by approximately 5150 participants, with the largest demographic group being clinical medical students (49%). Results from the survey revealed three broad themes which were: 1). Interactivity: question + answer (Q+A), multiple choice questions (MCQs), online tools 2). Content: case examples, orthopaedic examinations, objective structure clinical examination (OSCE) tips  3). Accessibility: slides, recordings, duration of the session. Our study found that the online teaching program improved students' clinical knowledge of T&O and they found learning through interactive methods such as polls, the chat function on zoom, and case-based discussions to be most useful. Also, from the results of this study, a guide on "How to Run a Successful Webinar Series for Medical Students" was developed. Conclusion Online webinars effectively supplement T&O teaching and experience for medical students whose T&O placements were disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results will be a helpful guide to those planning medical education webinars in the future.

Indexed as

conducting a webinarcovid-19online learningonline medical educationorthopaedicsvirtual learningvirtual learning environmentwebinarwebinar series

Identifiers

PMID36196309
PMCPMC9524301
OpenAlexW4293756029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.