Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36196294›Full record

ReviewRegenerative biomaterials2022

Recent advances in biopolymer-based hemostatic materials.

Marvin Mecwan, Jinghang Li, Natashya Falcone, Menekse Ermis, Emily Torres, Ramon Morales, Alireza Hassani, Reihaneh Haghniaz, Kalpana Mandal, Saurabh Sharma and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Regenerative biomaterials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Polysaccharides and carbohydrate polymers: innovations from nature to industry.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. AntibacterialInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Marvin MecwanTerasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Los Angeles, CA 90064, USA.
Jinghang LiTerasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Los Angeles, CA 90064, USA.
Natashya FalconeTerasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Los Angeles, CA 90064, USA.
Menekse ErmisTerasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Los Angeles, CA 90064, USA.
Emily TorresTerasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Los Angeles, CA 90064, USA.
Ramon MoralesTerasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Los Angeles, CA 90064, USA.
Alireza HassaniTerasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Los Angeles, CA 90064, USA.
Reihaneh HaghniazTerasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Los Angeles, CA 90064, USA.
Kalpana MandalTerasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Los Angeles, CA 90064, USA.
Saurabh SharmaTerasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Los Angeles, CA 90064, USA.
Surjendu MaityTerasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Los Angeles, CA 90064, USA.
Fatemeh ZehtabiTerasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Los Angeles, CA 90064, USA.
Behnam ZamanianTerasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Los Angeles, CA 90064, USA.
Rondinelli HerculanoTerasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Los Angeles, CA 90064, USA.
Mohsen AkbariTerasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Los Angeles, CA 90064, USA.
Johnson V JohnTerasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Los Angeles, CA 90064, USA.
Ali KhademhosseiniTerasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Los Angeles, CA 90064, USA.
Terasaki Foundation · USUniversity of Victoria · CA

Funding

Hemorrhage control in the irreversible anticoagulated patientR01HL137193 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI OKLU, RAHMI · 2017 to 2021
$3.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL137193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemorrhage is the leading cause of trauma-related deaths, in hospital and prehospital settings. Hemostasis is a complex mechanism that involves a cascade of clotting factors and proteins that result in the formation of a strong clot. In certain surgical and emergency situations, hemostatic agents are needed to achieve faster blood coagulation to prevent the patient from experiencing a severe hemorrhagic shock. Therefore, it is critical to consider appropriate materials and designs for hemostatic agents. Many materials have been fabricated as hemostatic agents, including synthetic and naturally derived polymers. Compared to synthetic polymers, natural polymers or biopolymers, which include polysaccharides and polypeptides, have greater biocompatibility, biodegradability and processibility. Thus, in this review, we focus on biopolymer-based hemostatic agents of different forms, such as powder, particles, sponges and hydrogels. Finally, we discuss biopolymer-based hemostatic materials currently in clinical trials and offer insight into next-generation hemostats for clinical translation.

Indexed as

biomaterialscoagulationhemostasispolypeptidespolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID36196294
PMCPMC9522468
OpenAlexW4296704750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.