ArticleCureus2022
Determining the Site of Upper Airway Narrowing in Snorers Using a Noninvasive Technique.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background In this study, we aimed to determine the site of obstruction if surgical treatment is considered. Flexible nasopharyngoscopy is an invasive procedure currently used for the assessment of snoring and the level of obstruction. Here, we examine the role of Somnoscreen™ plus, a noninvasive cardiorespiratory polysomnographic device, in identifying the site of obstruction in patients presenting with snoring. Methodology This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Sleep Research Center at King Abdulaziz University Hospital. Polysomnography was conducted using Somnoscreen™ plus. All participants underwent flexible nasopharyngoscopy after polysomnography. Results Nasopharyngoscopy revealed that the most common site of obstruction was the nose and the soft palate (35.4%), followed by the soft palate alone (25%). Somnoscreen revealed that the site of obstruction was the nose and the soft palate in 18 (37.5%) patients and the nose alone in 16 (33.3%) patients. However, distal obstructions were not detected using Somnoscreen. The concordance of nasopharyngoscopy and Somnoscreen was 52.9%. However, it showed a discrepancy in identifying distal obstructions, which Somnoscreen™ plus failed to detect. Conclusions Somnoscreen appears to be sensitive for identifying proximal airway obstructions. The audio signal recordings can potentially be used as a tool to detect the site of airway obstruction in snoring; however, further studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.