ArticleCureus2022
Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Nanohybrid Composite Restoration After the Placement of Flowable Compomer and Composite Using the Snowplow Technique.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Different Luting Protocols on the Bond Strength of Fiber-Reinforced CAD/CAM Blocks.Polymers · 2026Article
- Article
- [Post-aging comparative study of snowplow and conventional techniques for the resin restoration of defective primary teeth].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2025Article
- The effect of depth of cure on microhardness between bulk-fill and hybrid composite resin material.The Saudi dental journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimBased on the importance of bonding during restoration, this in vitro study aimed to evaluate the difference in shear bond strength of nanohybrid composite restoration in molars after the placement of flowable compomer and composite using the snowplow technique. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwenty-four freshly extracted molars were taken and sectioned at the level of 2.5 mm from the coronal cusp and root tip. These sections were embedded in methacrylate and, after etching and bonding, were randomly divided into two groups (n=12) for placement of restorative materials. In group A, the plastic tube was filled with uncured flowable composite resin followed by the placement of packable nanohybrid composite in oblique increments. In group B, the plastic tube was filled with uncured flowable compomer followed by the placement of packable nanohybrid composite in oblique increments. Each specimen was then tested under a universal testing machine to determine the shear bond strength.
resultsIndependent sample 't' test revealed a statistically significant difference between the mean shear bond strength of compomer and composite (P value<0.001), where flowable composite showed higher values compared to compomer. Conclusion: It was seen that the use of composite showed a significantly better bond strength of the restoration when compared to compomer using the snowplow technique. Both materials and application techniques can influence the bond strength of a material as determined in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.