Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36196277›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology2022

Efficacy of Intravenous Ustekinumab Reinduction in Patients With Crohn's Disease With a Loss of Response.

Valerie Heron, Steven Li Fraine, Nicola Panaccione, Sophie Restellini, Pascale Germain, Kristina Candido, Charles N Bernstein, Talat Bessissow, Alain Bitton, Usha K Chauhan and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy of Dose Escalation of Ustekinumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Valerie HeronDivision of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Steven Li FraineInflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Nicola PanaccioneInflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AlbertaCanada.
Sophie RestelliniDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geneva's University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Pascale GermainInflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Kristina CandidoInflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Charles N BernsteinDepartment of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rad Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, and the University of Manitoba IBD Clinical and Research Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Talat BessissowInflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2610-1910
Alain BittonInflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Usha K ChauhanDepartment of Medicine (Division of Gastroenterology) and Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7193-0657
Peter L LakatosInflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3948-6488
John K MarshallDepartment of Medicine (Division of Gastroenterology) and Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Pierre MichettiGastroenterology Beaulieu and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Cynthia H SeowInflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AlbertaCanada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1551-9054
Greg RosenfeldDivision of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Remo PanaccioneInflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AlbertaCanada.
Waqqas AfifInflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
McGill University Health Centre · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAPopulation Health Research Institute · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Geneva · CHUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aims: In patients receiving ustekinumab (UST) for treatment of Crohn's disease, there is no proven strategy to enhance or re-capture response. We assessed the utility of UST intravenous (IV) reinduction (~6 mg/kg) to achieve clinical, biochemical and endoscopic response or remission, in patients with partial or loss of response to UST maintenance therapy. Methods: A multicentre, retrospective cohort study was performed. Adults who received an IV reinduction dose of UST for either partial response or secondary loss of response to UST were assessed. The primary outcome was clinical remission off corticosteroids (Harvey Bradshaw Index <5), with biochemical response (defined as ≥ 50% decrease of CRP or FCP and/or endoscopic response (defined as a decrease in Simple Endoscopic Score-CD ≥ 50%). Secondary outcomes included clinical, biomarker and endoscopic response/remission, as well as safety. Results: Sixty-five patients (median age 38 years, 54.7% women) underwent IV UST reinduction between January 2017 and April 2019. Most patients (88.3%) were already on escalated maintenance dosing of UST 90 mg subcutaneous every 4 weeks. Clinical outcomes were assessed at a median of 14 weeks (IQR: 12-19) post-reinduction. The primary outcome of clinical remission off corticosteroids with biochemical and/or endoscopic response was achieved in 31.0% ( Conclusions: UST IV reinduction can be effective in patients with Crohn's disease with partial or loss of response to UST maintenance therapy. Further studies evaluating this strategy are warranted.

Indexed as

Crohn’s diseaseReinductionTherapeutic drug monitoringUstekinumab

Identifiers

PMID36196277
PMCPMC9527659
OpenAlexW4226491388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.