Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36196274›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology2022

High Diagnostic Yield of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Brush Cytology for Indeterminate Strictures.

Abdulsemed M Nur, Misbah Salim, Scott Boerner, Suqing Li, Cindy C Y Law, Leanne Edwards, Kaitlin Ryan, Paul D James

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abdulsemed M NurDepartment of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Misbah SalimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Scott BoernerDepartment of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Suqing LiDepartment of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4873-3628
Cindy C Y LawDepartment of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7025-8029
Leanne EdwardsDepartment of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Kaitlin RyanDepartment of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Paul D JamesDepartment of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
University Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) brush cytology is used frequently for sampling indeterminate biliary strictures. Studies have demonstrated that the diagnostic yield of brush cytology for malignant strictures is estimated to be 6%-70%. With improved diagnostic tools, sampling techniques and specimen processing, the yield of ERCP brush cytology may be higher. This study aimed to assess the yield of brush cytology and determine factors associated with a positive diagnosis. Methods: This was a cohort study of patients who underwent ERCP brush cytology from October 2017 to May 2020. Patient demographics, clinical, procedural and pathological data were collected using chart review. Sampling data were captured up to 3 months post-index ERCP to capture repeat brushings, biopsies or surgical resections. Outcomes included the diagnostic yield, true/false positive values and true/false negative values of malignancy detection using ERCP brush cytology. Results: A total of 126 patients underwent a brush cytology, 58% were male and 79% had a stricture in the extrahepatic region. Ninety-three patients were diagnosed with a malignancy, of which 78 had positive brush cytology results and 15 had a negative brush cytology result. The diagnostic yield, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were 84%, 83%, 97%, 99%, 68% and 87% respectively. Conclusion: ERCP brush cytology performed using updated sampling technique is associated with high diagnostic yield. This allows for earlier malignancy diagnosis, timely treatment and decreased need for further investigation.

Indexed as

BiliaryEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyMalignancyStricture

Identifiers

PMID36196274
PMCPMC9527657
OpenAlexW4226338828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.