Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36196095›Full record

ArticleApplied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association2022

Biosafety Practices When Working with Bats: A Guide to Field Research Considerations.

Alvaro Aguilar-Setién, Nidia Aréchiga-Ceballos, Gary A Balsamo, Amy J Behrman, Hannah K Frank, Gary R Fujimoto, Elizabeth Gilman Duane, Thomas Warner Hudson, Shelley M Jones, Luis A Ochoa Carrera and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Drivers of bat researchers' intent to adopt field hygiene practices.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Establishing a national biosafety and biosecurity agency for the United States.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 14 institutions in 3 countries.

Alvaro Aguilar-SetiénCoordinación de Investigación Médica, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1339-2931
Nidia Aréchiga-CeballosLaboratorio de Rabia, Instituto de Diagnóstico y Referencia Epidemiológicos, Secretaría de Salud, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7450-3060
Gary A BalsamoLouisiana Department of Health, Office of Public Health, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Amy J BehrmanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Hannah K FrankDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Gary R FujimotoOccupational and Internal Medicine Consultant, Los Altos, California, USA.
Elizabeth Gilman DuaneBiosafety Consultant, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Thomas Warner HudsonDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Shelley M JonesDepartment of Environmental Health and Safety, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
Luis A Ochoa CarreraOffice of Environmental Health and Safety, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Gregory L PowellDepartment of Environmental Health and Safety, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6097-9092
Carrie A SmithU.S. Geological Survey National Wildlife Health Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Joni Triantis Van SickleBiosafety Office, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Susan E VleckDepartment of Environmental Health and Safety, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Alto Neuroscience (United States) · USArizona State University · USColorado State University · USGenØk · NOLouisiana State Department of Health and Hospitals · USMexican Social Security Institute · MXMichigan State University · USNational Wildlife Health Center · USNorthern Arizona University · USSecretaria de Salud · MXStanford Health Care · USTulane University · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Field work with bats is an important contribution to many areas of research in environmental biology and ecology, as well as microbiology. Work with bats poses hazards such as bites and scratches, and the potential for exposure to infectious pathogens such as rabies virus. It also exposes researchers to many other potential hazards inherent to field work, such as environmental conditions, delayed emergency responses, or challenging work conditions. Methods: This article discusses the considerations for a thorough risk assessment process around field work with bats, pre- and post-occupational health considerations, and delves into specific considerations for areas related to biosafety concerns-training, personal protective equipment, safety consideration in field methods, decontamination, and waste. It also touches on related legal and ethical issues that sit outside the realm of biosafety, but which must be addressed during the planning process. Discussion: Although the focal point of this article is bat field work located in northern and central America, the principles and practices discussed here are applicable to bat work elsewhere, as well as to field work with other animal species, and should promote careful considerations of how to safely conduct field work to protect both researchers and animals.

Indexed as

batbiosafetycoronavirusesfield safetyrabies

Identifiers

PMID36196095
PMCPMC9526472
OpenAlexW4295995786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.