ReviewHuman reproduction open2022
Evidence and consensus on technical aspects of embryo transfer.
Review in Human reproduction open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- ESHRE recommendations on Good Practice in the IVF laboratory†.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2026Guideline
- The impact of difficult embryo transfer on the success of IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2023Pooled it
- How long is too long? The influence of the whole transfer procedure duration on pregnancy rates.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Embryo transfer in dairy herds: a comprehensive review of factors affecting pregnancy success from donor to embryo and recipient.Veterinary research communications · 2026Review
- Clinician-related variability as an independent determinant of in vitro fertilization success: A retrospective cohort study of intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2026Article
- Acromegalic Uteropathy: Specific Uterine Ultrasound Findings in Female Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Studies on the Possibility of Introducing New Materials into Reproductive Biotechnology and a New Type of Catheter for Embryo Transfer.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Current Evidence, Limitations, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- "How did it go?"-investigation of physician's experience during embryo transfer and subsequent pregnancy outcomes.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- The addition of heat shock protein 70 toOpen veterinary journal · 2025Article
- A standardized training allows achieving similar clinical pregnancy rates per top-quality euploid blastocyst transfer across operators.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Insulin-like growth factor 1 and estrogen from cumulus cell culture increases the success ofOpen veterinary journal · 2025Article
- Impact of ultrasound operator training on clinical pregnancy rates during embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Article
- Trophectoderm, Inner Cell Mass, and Expansion Status for Live Birth Prediction After Frozen Blastocyst Transfer: The Winner Is Trophectoderm.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Factors Affecting the Outcomes of First in vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer: A Retrospective Investigation.International journal of women's health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUltrasound-guided embryo transfer (US-GET) is a widely performed procedure, but standards for the best practice are not available. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: This document aims to provide an overview of technical aspects of US-GET after considering the published data and including the preparation for the embryo transfer (ET) procedure, the actual procedure, the post-procedure care, associated pathologies, complications and risks, quality assurance and practitioners' performance. SEARCH
methodsA literature search for evidence on key aspects of the ET procedure was carried out from database inception to November 2021. Selected papers (n = 359) relevant to the topic were analysed by the authors. The following key points were considered in the papers: whether ultrasound (US) practice standards were explained, to what extent the ET technique was described and whether complications or incidents and how to prevent such events were reported. In the end, 89 papers could be used to support the recommendations in this document, which focused on transabdominal US-GET. OUTCOMES: The relevant papers found in the literature search were included in the current document and described according to the topic in three main sections: requirements and preparations prior to ET, the ET procedure and training and competence for ET. Recommendations are provided on preparations prior to ET, equipment and materials, ET technique, possible risks and complications, training and competence. Specific aspects of the laboratory procedures are covered, in particular the different loading techniques and their potential impact on the final outcomes. Potential future developments and research priorities regarding the ET technique are also outlined. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Many topics were not covered in the literature review and some recommendations were based on expert opinions and are not necessarily evidence based. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: ET is the last procedural step in an ART treatment and is a crucial step towards achieving a pregnancy and live birth. The current paper set out to bring together the recent developments considering all aspects of ET, especially emphasizing US quality imaging. There are still many questions needing answers, and these can be subject of future research. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No funding. A.D.A. has received royalties from CRC Press and personal honorarium from Cook, Ferring and Cooper Surgical. The other co-authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.