Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36195961›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research2022

Modelling the effects of antimicrobial metaphylaxis and pen size on bovine respiratory disease in high and low risk fattening cattle.

Sébastien Picault, Pauline Ezanno, Kristen Smith, David Amrine, Brad White, Sébastien Assié

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sébastien PicaultINRAE, Oniris, BIOEPAR, 44300, Nantes, France. sebastien.picault@inrae.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9029-0555
Pauline EzannoINRAE, Oniris, BIOEPAR, 44300, Nantes, France.
Kristen SmithBeef Cattle Institute, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
David AmrineBeef Cattle Institute, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Brad WhiteBeef Cattle Institute, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Sébastien AssiéINRAE, Oniris, BIOEPAR, 44300, Nantes, France.
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRKansas State University · US

Funding

Conseil Régional des Pays de la Loire PULSAR 2021Horizon 2020 101000494Institut Carnot France Futur Élevage (FR) SEPTIME
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) dramatically affects young calves, especially in fattening facilities, and is difficult to understand, anticipate and control due to the multiplicity of factors involved in the onset and impact of this disease. In this study we aimed to compare the impact of farming practices on BRD severity and on antimicrobial usage. We designed a stochastic individual-based mechanistic BRD model which incorporates not only the infectious process, but also clinical signs, detection methods and treatment protocols. We investigated twelve contrasted scenarios which reflect farming practices in various fattening systems, based on pen sizes, risk level, and individual treatment vs. collective treatment (metaphylaxis) before or during fattening. We calibrated model parameters from existing observation data or literature and compared scenario outputs regarding disease dynamics, severity and mortality. The comparison of the trade-off between cumulative BRD duration and number of antimicrobial doses highlighted the added value of risk reduction at pen formation even in small pens, and acknowledges the interest of collective treatments for high-risk pens, with a better efficacy of treatments triggered during fattening based on the number of detected cases.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsBovine Respiratory Disease ComplexRespiratory Tract DiseasesAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCattleFarmsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agentsantimicrobial usagebovine respiratory diseasedisease controlEpidemiological modellingfarming practicesstochastic models

Identifiers

PMID36195961
PMCPMC9531528
OpenAlexW4301183442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.