Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36195873›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Knowledge, attitudes, perceptions, and COVID-19 hesitancy in a large public university in Mexico city during the early vaccination rollout.

Norma Mongua-Rodríguez, Mauricio Rodríguez-Álvarez, Daniela De-la-Rosa-Zamboni, María Eugenia Jiménez-Corona, Martha Lucía Castañeda-Cediel, Guadalupe Miranda-Novales, Gustavo Cruz-Pacheco, Elizabeth Ferreira-Guerrero, Leticia Ferreyra-Reyes, Guadalupe Delgado-Sánchez and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Vaccination status and attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination in patients undergoing active cancer treatment in a referral center in Mexico: a survey study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Norma Mongua-RodríguezInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.
Mauricio Rodríguez-ÁlvarezPrograma Universitario de Investigación en Salud, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Ciudad Universitaria, Ciudad de México, México.
Daniela De-la-Rosa-ZamboniHospital Infantil de México "Federico Gómez", Ciudad de México, México.
María Eugenia Jiménez-CoronaInstituto Nacional de Cardiología, Ciudad de México, México.
Martha Lucía Castañeda-CedielPosgrado en Geografía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Ciudad de México, México.
Guadalupe Miranda-NovalesUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.
Gustavo Cruz-PachecoInstituto de Investigaciones en Matemáticas Aplicadas y en Sistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.
Elizabeth Ferreira-GuerreroInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.
Leticia Ferreyra-ReyesInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.
Guadalupe Delgado-SánchezInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.
Maribel Martínez-HernándezInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.
Arturo Cruz-SalgadoInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.
Rogelio Pérez-PadillaInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Ciudad de México, México.
Samuel Ponce-de-LeónPrograma Universitario de Investigación en Salud, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Ciudad Universitaria, Ciudad de México, México.
Lourdes García-GarcíaInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México. garcigarml@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccination against COVID-19 is a primary tool for controlling the pandemic. However, the spread of vaccine hesitancy constitutes a significant threat to reverse progress in preventing the disease. Studies conducted in Mexico have revealed that vaccination intention in Mexico among the general population ranges from 62 to 82%.

objectiveTo know the prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and associated factors among academics, students, and administrative personnel of a public university in Mexico City.

methodsWe administered an online survey investigating sociodemographic aspects, knowledge, attitudes, practices, and acceptance/hesitancy regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. Using generalized linear Poisson models, we analyzed factors associated with vaccine hesitancy, defined as not intending to be vaccinated within the following six months or refusing vaccination.

resultsDuring May and June 2021, we studied 840 people, prevalence of vaccine hesitancy was 6%. Hesitancy was significantly associated with fear of adverse effects, distrust of physician's recommendations, lack of knowledge regarding handwashing, age younger than 40 years, refusal to use face masks, and not having received influenza vaccination during the two previous seasons.

conclusionsVaccine hesitancy in this population is low. Furthermore, our results allowed us the identification of characteristics that can improve vaccine promotion.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesAdultCOVID-19 VaccinesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMexicoPatient Acceptance of Health CareUniversitiesVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesAttitudesCOVID-19KnowledgeMexicoPracticesSARS-CoV-2SurveyUniversityVaccine

Identifiers

PMID36195873
PMCPMC9531223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.