ArticleBMC surgery2022
Epidemiology of revision hip replacement in Italy: a 15-year study.
Article in BMC surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Electro-Neuro-Feedback (ENF) Treatment in Reducing Post-Surgical Hematoma in Young and Active Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Why revision of total hip arthroplasty fails: a retrospective consecutive cohort study of 963 patients.Bone & joint open · 2026Article
- Factors associated with aseptic loosening after primary total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of orthopedics · 2026Article
- Monoblock or modular? Impact of stem design and conicity angle on long-term implant survival in revision total hip arthroplasty: a 20-year follow-up registry study on 3647 implants.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Article
- Current Concepts in Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Arthroplasty: A Review of the Perioperative Pathway.Cureus · 2025Review
- Revolutionizing total hip arthroplasty: The role of artificial intelligence and machine learning.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- I Am Afraid I Will Not Be Able to Walk, That Is What Worries Me-The Experience of Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis before Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Qualitative Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Cementless Primary Stems in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Patients' Perceptions and Experiences during the Pre-Admission Phase for Total Hip Replacement Surgery: A Qualitative Phenomenological Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Total Hip Replacement: Psychometric Validation of the Italian Version of Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12).Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOver the past two decades, there has been an increase in the amount of primary total hip arthroscopies (THA) which in turn has increased the need for THA revision surgeries. The purpose of this study was to quantify the increase in THA revision in Italy, evaluate the causes and types of THA procedures performed.
methodsThe data regarding revision hip prosthetic replacements performed both in public and private structures between 2001 and 2015 was collected by the National Hospital Discharge reports (SDO) carried out by the Italian Ministry of Health.
resultsOverall, 109,746 Revision Hip Replacements (RHR) were performed in Italy from 2001 to 2015 in the adult population. The study shows a greater number of female patients underwent surgery between 2001 and 2015 and the 75- to 79-year age group had the highest incidence of THA revision. The main causes for THA revision were found to be "Mechanical complication of internal orthopedic device implant and graft" (31.5%), "Infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal joint prosthesis" (10.5%) and "Mechanical loosening of prosthetic joint" (8.3%).
conclusionsRevision hip replacement is growing and heavily affecting the population between 65 and 89 years and the main causes of THA revision have been quantified. The average length of hospitalization (LOS) was found to have decreased over the 14-year study period. Understanding the causes and risk factors for revision is essential in identifying avoidable complications and improving preventative care for patients undergoing primary implantation to decrease the revision burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.