Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36195818›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2023

A Machine Learning Approach for the Prediction of Severe Acute Kidney Injury Following Traumatic Brain Injury.

Chi Peng, Fan Yang, Lulu Li, Liwei Peng, Jian Yu, Peng Wang, Zhichao Jin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Machine Learning Approaches to Prognostication in Traumatic Brain Injury.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chi Peng *Department of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Fan Yang *Institute of Pathology and Southwest Cancer Center, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University) and Key Laboratory of Tumor Immunopathology, Ministry of Education of China, Chongqing, China.
Lulu Li *Department of Orthopedics, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Liwei Peng *Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Jian YuDepartment of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Peng WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Zhichao JinDepartment of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China. jinzhichao@smmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-3180-6475

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI), a prevalent non-neurological complication following traumatic brain injury (TBI), is a major clinical issue with an unfavorable prognosis. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models to predict severe AKI (stage 3 or greater) incidence in patients with TBI.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted by using two public databases: the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC)-IV and the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD). Recursive feature elimination was used to select candidate predictors obtained within 24 h of intensive care unit admission. The area under the curve and decision curve analysis curves were used to determine the discriminatory ability. On the other hand, the calibration curve was employed to evaluate the calibrated performance of the newly developed machine learning models.

resultsIn the MIMIC-IV database, there were 808 patients diagnosed with moderate and severe TBI (msTBI) (msTBI is defined as Glasgow Coma Score < 12). Of these, 60 (7.43%) patients experienced severe AKI. External validation in the eICU-CRD indicated that the random forest (RF) model had the highest area under the curve of 0.819 (95% confidence interval 0.783-0.851). Furthermore, in the calibration curve, the RF model was well calibrated (P = 0.795).

conclusionsIn this study, the RF model demonstrated better discrimination in predicting severe AKI than other models. An online calculator could facilitate its application, potentially improving the early detection of severe AKI and subsequently improving the clinical outcomes among patients with msTBI.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryBrain Injuries, TraumaticHospitalizationHumansMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesAcute kidney injuryExternal validationMachine learningModel interpretationTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.