ArticleNeurocritical care2023
A Machine Learning Approach for the Prediction of Severe Acute Kidney Injury Following Traumatic Brain Injury.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimated plasma volume status and the risk of 30-day mortality among patients with traumatic brain injury: analysis from the MIMIC-IV database.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Development and external validation of an interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of in-hospital mortality in neurocritical care.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of acute kidney injury after intracerebral hemorrhage: Comparison of multiple model approaches.Medicine · 2025Article
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Acute Kidney Injury Risk Classification.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Early Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Neurocritical Care: A Comparative Analysis of XGBoost, GBM, and Random Forest Algorithms.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
- Machine Learning Approaches to Prognostication in Traumatic Brain Injury.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025Review
- Machine learning approaches toward an understanding of acute kidney injury: current trends and future directions.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI), a prevalent non-neurological complication following traumatic brain injury (TBI), is a major clinical issue with an unfavorable prognosis. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models to predict severe AKI (stage 3 or greater) incidence in patients with TBI.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted by using two public databases: the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC)-IV and the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD). Recursive feature elimination was used to select candidate predictors obtained within 24 h of intensive care unit admission. The area under the curve and decision curve analysis curves were used to determine the discriminatory ability. On the other hand, the calibration curve was employed to evaluate the calibrated performance of the newly developed machine learning models.
resultsIn the MIMIC-IV database, there were 808 patients diagnosed with moderate and severe TBI (msTBI) (msTBI is defined as Glasgow Coma Score < 12). Of these, 60 (7.43%) patients experienced severe AKI. External validation in the eICU-CRD indicated that the random forest (RF) model had the highest area under the curve of 0.819 (95% confidence interval 0.783-0.851). Furthermore, in the calibration curve, the RF model was well calibrated (P = 0.795).
conclusionsIn this study, the RF model demonstrated better discrimination in predicting severe AKI than other models. An online calculator could facilitate its application, potentially improving the early detection of severe AKI and subsequently improving the clinical outcomes among patients with msTBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36195818What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.