ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2023
Design, Analysis and Experimental Validation of a Novel 7-Degrees of Freedom Instrument for Laparoscopic Surgeries.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Hybrid Compliant-Tendon Laparoscopic Instrument for Distal Articulation and Grasping: Design and Experimental Validation.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026Article
- Global trends and hotspots in robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal diseases: a bibliometric and visualization.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- A review of wrist mechanism design and the application in gastrointestinal minimally invasive surgery of multi-degree-of-freedom surgical laparoscopic instruments.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Review
- ArtiSential laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative analysis with robotic single-port cholecystectomy.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2024Article
- Biochemical implications of robotic surgery: a new frontier in the operating room.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Review
- Surgeon perception of factors affecting the efficiency of conventional and robotic laparoscopy: A Pan India study.Heliyon · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laparoscopic surgery is widely used for treating intra-abdominal conditions involving the gallbladder, pancreas, liver, intestines and reproductive organs. Conventional laparoscopy instruments used in manual surgeries usually have straight shafts and four degrees of freedom (DOF) plus grasping. However, these are insufficient for the complete rotation of the instrument tip. This makes it challenging to access difficult-to-reach organs inside the abdomen during the surgeries. A few robotic instruments available in the market have higher maneuverability but are expensive. Instruments incorporating cable-based mechanisms require replacement after a few sterilization cycles. This paper describes a novel, reusable and affordable multi-DOF laparoscopy instrument that provides two additional DOF: (a) wrist articulation about one axis (wristed yaw) and (b) rotation of the jaw after articulation (jaw roll). The wrist can articulate up to 45° and also roll after articulation. The additional degrees of freedom enable better maneuverability, functionality and reach than conventional laparoscopy instruments. Further, the new instrument employs only rigid links, providing better strength and minimal loss of function after multiple sterilizations. The complete design of the novel instrument, followed by its kinematic analysis and force calculations are explained in this paper, concluding with its manufacture and experimental validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.