Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36195725›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Measurement invariance of six language versions of the post-traumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5 in civilians after traumatic brain injury.

Fabian Bockhop, Marina Zeldovich, Katrin Cunitz, Dominique Van Praag, Marjolein van der Vlegel, Tim Beissbarth, York Hagmayer, Nicole von Steinbuechel, CENTER-TBI participants and investigators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fabian BockhopInstitute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073, Göttingen, Germany. fabian.bockhop@med.uni-goettingen.de.
Marina ZeldovichInstitute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073, Göttingen, Germany.
Katrin CunitzInstitute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073, Göttingen, Germany.
Dominique Van PraagDepartment of Psychology, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
Marjolein van der VlegelDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Tim BeissbarthDepartment of Medical Bioinformatics, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
York HagmayerGeorg-Elias-Mueller Institute for Psychology, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany.
Nicole von SteinbuechelInstitute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073, Göttingen, Germany.
CENTER-TBI participants and investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is frequently associated with neuropsychiatric impairments such as symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which can be screened using self-report instruments such as the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). The current study aims to inspect the factorial validity and cross-linguistic equivalence of the PCL-5 in individuals after TBI with differential severity. Data for six language groups (n ≥ 200; Dutch, English, Finnish, Italian, Norwegian, Spanish) were extracted from the CENTER-TBI study database. Factorial validity of PTSD was evaluated using confirmatory factor analyses (CFA), and compared between four concurrent structural models. A multi-group CFA approach was utilized to investigate the measurement invariance (MI) of the PCL-5 across languages. All structural models showed satisfactory goodness-of-fit with small between-model variation. The original DSM-5 model for PTSD provided solid evidence of MI across the language groups. The current study underlines the validity of the clinical DSM-5 conceptualization of PTSD and demonstrates the comparability of PCL-5 symptom scores between language versions in individuals after TBI. Future studies should apply MI methods to other sociodemographic (e.g., age, gender) and injury-related (e.g., TBI severity) characteristics to improve the monitoring and clinical care of individuals suffering from PTSD symptoms after TBI.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticChecklistDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersHumansLanguage

Identifiers

PMID36195725
PMCPMC9532419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.