Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36195629›Full record

ReviewPediatric research2023

Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of necrotising enterocolitis in newborns.

Arkadiusz Sitek, Joanna Seliga-Siwecka, Szymon Płotka, Michal K Grzeszczyk, Szymon Seliga, Krzysztof Włodarczyk, Renata Bokiniec

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. [Recent advances in artificial intelligence for auxiliary diagnosis and management of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Blood absolute monocyte count trends in preterm infants with suspected necrotizing enterocolitis: an adjunct tool for diagnosis?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Arkadiusz SitekSano Centre for Computational Medicine, Cracow, Poland. asitek@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0677-4002
Joanna Seliga-SiweckaDepartment of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. joanna.seliga@wum.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-4628-0541
Szymon PłotkaSano Centre for Computational Medicine, Cracow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9411-820X
Michal K GrzeszczykSano Centre for Computational Medicine, Cracow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5304-1020
Szymon SeligaSano Centre for Computational Medicine, Cracow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4496-3306
Krzysztof WłodarczykMain Library, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2951-3120
Renata BokiniecDepartment of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1164-8406
Medical University of Warsaw · PLMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) is one of the most common diseases in neonates and predominantly affects premature or very-low-birth-weight infants. Diagnosis is difficult and needed in hours since the first symptom onset for the best therapeutic effects. Artificial intelligence (AI) may play a significant role in NEC diagnosis. A literature search on the use of AI in the diagnosis of NEC was performed. Four databases (PubMed, Embase, arXiv, and IEEE Xplore) were searched with the appropriate MeSH terms. The search yielded 118 publications that were reduced to 8 after screening and checking for eligibility. Of the eight, five used classic machine learning (ML), and three were on the topic of deep ML. Most publications showed promising results. However, no publications with evident clinical benefits were found. Datasets used for training and testing AI systems were small and typically came from a single institution. The potential of AI to improve the diagnosis of NEC is evident. The body of literature on this topic is scarce, and more research in this area is needed, especially with a focus on clinical utility. Cross-institutional data for the training and testing of AI algorithms are required to make progress in this area. IMPACT: Only a few publications on the use of AI in NEC diagnosis are available although they offer some evidence that AI may be helpful in NEC diagnosis. AI requires large, multicentre, and multimodal datasets of high quality for model training and testing. Published results in the literature are based on data from single institutions and, as such, have limited generalisability. Large multicentre studies evaluating broad datasets are needed to evaluate the true potential of AI in diagnosing NEC in a clinical setting.

Indexed as

Enterocolitis, NecrotizingInfant, Newborn, DiseasesArtificial IntelligenceHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Very Low Birth Weight

Identifiers

PMID36195629
OpenAlexW4301396045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.