ReviewPediatric research2023
Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of necrotising enterocolitis in newborns.
Review in Pediatric research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emerging Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Care.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- Emerging role of artificial intelligence in necrotizing enterocolitis and implementation challenges.Pediatric research · 2026Review
- Deep learning feature-based model on abdominal radiography outperforms experts for early necrotizing enterocolitis diagnosis in neonates.European radiology · 2026Article
- Interpretable clinical decision support systems in high-risk pregnancy: a scoping review of models, methods, and implementation.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Transforming neonatal care through informatics: A review of artificial intelligence, data, and implementation considerations.Seminars in perinatology · 2025Review
- Defining endotypes of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants to improve precision-based therapies.JCI insight · 2025Review
- [Recent advances in artificial intelligence for auxiliary diagnosis and management of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025Review
- AXpert: human expert facilitated privacy-preserving large language models for abdominal X-ray report labeling.JAMIA open · 2025Article
- Blood absolute monocyte count trends in preterm infants with suspected necrotizing enterocolitis: an adjunct tool for diagnosis?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024Article
- Struggling to Understand the NEC Spectrum-Could the Integration of Metabolomics, Clinical-Laboratory Data, and Other Emerging Technologies Help Diagnosis?Metabolites · 2024Review
- An investigation into augmentation and preprocessing for optimising X-ray classification in limited datasets: a case study on necrotising enterocolitis.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024Article
- Development of an artificial intelligence-based multimodal model for assisting in the diagnosis of necrotizing enterocolitis in newborns: a retrospective study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Impact of Delayed Time to Antibiotics in Medical and Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- State of the art review on machine learning and artificial intelligence in the study of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) is one of the most common diseases in neonates and predominantly affects premature or very-low-birth-weight infants. Diagnosis is difficult and needed in hours since the first symptom onset for the best therapeutic effects. Artificial intelligence (AI) may play a significant role in NEC diagnosis. A literature search on the use of AI in the diagnosis of NEC was performed. Four databases (PubMed, Embase, arXiv, and IEEE Xplore) were searched with the appropriate MeSH terms. The search yielded 118 publications that were reduced to 8 after screening and checking for eligibility. Of the eight, five used classic machine learning (ML), and three were on the topic of deep ML. Most publications showed promising results. However, no publications with evident clinical benefits were found. Datasets used for training and testing AI systems were small and typically came from a single institution. The potential of AI to improve the diagnosis of NEC is evident. The body of literature on this topic is scarce, and more research in this area is needed, especially with a focus on clinical utility. Cross-institutional data for the training and testing of AI algorithms are required to make progress in this area. IMPACT: Only a few publications on the use of AI in NEC diagnosis are available although they offer some evidence that AI may be helpful in NEC diagnosis. AI requires large, multicentre, and multimodal datasets of high quality for model training and testing. Published results in the literature are based on data from single institutions and, as such, have limited generalisability. Large multicentre studies evaluating broad datasets are needed to evaluate the true potential of AI in diagnosing NEC in a clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.