Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36195614›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Recurrent neural networks with explicit representation of dynamic latent variables can mimic behavioral patterns in a physical inference task.

Rishi Rajalingham, Aída Piccato, Mehrdad Jazayeri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Linking neural population formatting to function.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Shaping dynamical neural computations using spatiotemporal constraints.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Monkeys engage in visual simulation to solve complex problems.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rishi RajalinghamMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Building 46, 43 Vassar St., Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Aída PiccatoMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Building 46, 43 Vassar St., Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Mehrdad JazayeriMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Building 46, 43 Vassar St., Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA. mjaz@mit.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9764-6961

Funding

CRCNS: US-French Research Proposal: Principles of Inference through Neural Dynamics R01MH122025 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI JAZAYERI, MEHRDAD · 2019 to 2023
$1.2M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primates can richly parse sensory inputs to infer latent information. This ability is hypothesized to rely on establishing mental models of the external world and running mental simulations of those models. However, evidence supporting this hypothesis is limited to behavioral models that do not emulate neural computations. Here, we test this hypothesis by directly comparing the behavior of primates (humans and monkeys) in a ball interception task to that of a large set of recurrent neural network (RNN) models with or without the capacity to dynamically track the underlying latent variables. Humans and monkeys exhibit similar behavioral patterns. This primate behavioral pattern is best captured by RNNs endowed with dynamic inference, consistent with the hypothesis that the primate brain uses dynamic inferences to support flexible physical predictions. Moreover, our work highlights a general strategy for using model neural systems to test computational hypotheses of higher brain function.

Indexed as

BrainNeural Networks, ComputerAnimalsHaplorhiniHumans

Identifiers

PMID36195614
PMCPMC9532407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.