Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36195611›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Identification of distinct functional thymic programming of fetal and pediatric human γδ thymocytes via single-cell analysis.

Guillem Sanchez Sanchez, Maria Papadopoulou, Abdulkader Azouz, Yohannes Tafesse, Archita Mishra, Jerry K Y Chan, Yiping Fan, Isoline Verdebout, Silvana Porco, Frédérick Libert and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cell stress activates γ9δ2 T cells via endogenous phosphoantigens and butyrophilin complex dynamics.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Rediscovering the human thymus through cutting-edge technologies.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Guillem Sanchez SanchezDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutics, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9919-1748
Maria PapadopoulouDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutics, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3006-1993
Abdulkader AzouzInstitute for Medical Immunology, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Gosselies, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8626-4370
Yohannes TafesseDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutics, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3883-6244
Archita MishraSingapore Immunology Network (SIgN), A*STAR, Singapore, 138648, Singapore.
Jerry K Y ChanDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, 229899, Singapore.
Yiping FanDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, 229899, Singapore.
Isoline VerdeboutDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutics, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4012-170X
Silvana PorcoDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutics, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Frédérick LibertBRIGHTcore ULB-VUB, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Florent GinhouxSingapore Immunology Network (SIgN), A*STAR, Singapore, 138648, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-2857-7755
Bart VandekerckhoveDepartment of Diagnostic Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Stanislas GorielyInstitute for Medical Immunology, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Gosselies, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7005-6195
David VermijlenDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutics, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium. David.Vermijlen@ulb.be.ORCID 0000-0002-7605-8845
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BEAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGNational University of Singapore · SGGhent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developmental thymic waves of innate-like and adaptive-like γδ T cells have been described, but the current understanding of γδ T cell development is mainly limited to mouse models. Here, we combine single cell (sc) RNA gene expression and sc γδ T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing on fetal and pediatric γδ thymocytes in order to understand the ontogeny of human γδ T cells. Mature fetal γδ thymocytes (both the Vγ9Vδ2 and nonVγ9Vδ2 subsets) are committed to either a type 1, a type 3 or a type 2-like effector fate displaying a wave-like pattern depending on gestation age, and are enriched for public CDR3 features upon maturation. Strikingly, these effector modules express different CDR3 sequences and follow distinct developmental trajectories. In contrast, the pediatric thymus generates only a small effector subset that is highly biased towards Vγ9Vδ2 TCR usage and shows a mixed type 1/type 3 effector profile. Thus, our combined dataset of gene expression and detailed TCR information at the single-cell level identifies distinct functional thymic programming of γδ T cell immunity in human.

Indexed as

ThymocytesT-Lymphocyte SubsetsAnimalsCell DifferentiationChildHumansMiceReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-deltaRNASingle-Cell AnalysisThymus GlandReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-deltaRNA

Identifiers

PMID36195611
PMCPMC9532436
OpenAlexW4301398506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.