Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36195610›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Iterative image segmentation of plant roots for high-throughput phenotyping.

Kyle Seidenthal, Karim Panjvani, Rahul Chandnani, Leon Kochian, Mark Eramian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Explainable deep learning in plant phenotyping.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kyle SeidenthalDepartment of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, 110 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5C9, Canada.
Karim PanjvaniGlobal Institute for Food Security, University of Saskatchewan, 421 Downey Road, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 4L8, Canada.
Rahul ChandnaniGlobal Institute for Food Security, University of Saskatchewan, 421 Downey Road, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 4L8, Canada.
Leon KochianGlobal Institute for Food Security, University of Saskatchewan, 421 Downey Road, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 4L8, Canada.
Mark EramianDepartment of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, 110 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5C9, Canada. eramian@cs.usask.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate segmentation of root system architecture (RSA) from 2D images is an important step in studying phenotypic traits of root systems. Various approaches to image segmentation exist but many of them are not well suited to the thin and reticulated structures characteristic of root systems. The findings presented here describe an approach to RSA segmentation that takes advantage of the inherent structural properties of the root system, a segmentation network architecture we call ITErRoot. We have also generated a novel 2D root image dataset which utilizes an annotation tool developed for producing high quality ground truth segmentation of root systems. Our approach makes use of an iterative neural network architecture to leverage the thin and highly branched properties of root systems for accurate segmentation. Rigorous analysis of model properties was carried out to obtain a high-quality model for 2D root segmentation. Results show a significant improvement over other recent approaches to root segmentation. Validation results show that the model generalizes to plant species with fine and highly branched RSA's, and performs particularly well in the presence of non-root objects.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedPlant RootsPhenotypePlants

Identifiers

PMID36195610
PMCPMC9532414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.