Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36195589›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Noise-injected analog Ising machines enable ultrafast statistical sampling and machine learning.

Fabian Böhm, Diego Alonso-Urquijo, Guy Verschaffelt, Guy Van der Sande

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Analytical Prediction of Critical Transitions in Oscillator Networks With Non-Local Links.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Metrics for spin-based computing.Nature reviews. Physics · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Random Lasers as Social Processes Simulators.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fabian BöhmApplied Physics Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium. fabian.bohm@vub.be.ORCID 0000-0001-8516-9785
Diego Alonso-UrquijoApplied Physics Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7635-1307
Guy VerschaffeltApplied Physics Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6291-0646
Guy Van der SandeApplied Physics Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium. Guy.Van.der.Sande@vub.be.ORCID 0000-0002-6724-2587

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ising machines are a promising non-von-Neumann computational concept for neural network training and combinatorial optimization. However, while various neural networks can be implemented with Ising machines, their inability to perform fast statistical sampling makes them inefficient for training neural networks compared to digital computers. Here, we introduce a universal concept to achieve ultrafast statistical sampling with analog Ising machines by injecting noise. With an opto-electronic Ising machine, we experimentally demonstrate that this can be used for accurate sampling of Boltzmann distributions and for unsupervised training of neural networks, with equal accuracy as software-based training. Through simulations, we find that Ising machines can perform statistical sampling orders-of-magnitudes faster than software-based methods. This enables the use of Ising machines beyond combinatorial optimization and makes them into efficient tools for machine learning and other applications.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID36195589
PMCPMC9532389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.