Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36195576›Full record

ReviewCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2022

Oncology biosimilars: New developments and future directions.

Rinda Devi Bachu, Mariam Abou-Dahech, Swapnaa Balaji, Sai H S Boddu, Samson Amos, Vishal Singh, R Jayachandra Babu, Amit K Tiwari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Financial burden of high-cost immunotherapy among cancer survivors in Medicare.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025
    Article
  7. Optimising oncology drug expenditure in Ireland.Irish journal of medical science · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rinda Devi BachuDepartment of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, College of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
Mariam Abou-DahechDepartment of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, College of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6208-0948
Swapnaa BalajiDepartment of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, College of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
Sai H S BodduCollege of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman, UAE.
Samson AmosDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cedarville University School of Pharmacy, Cedarville, Ohio, USA.
Vishal SinghDepartment of Nutrition, Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania, USA.
R Jayachandra BabuDepartment of Drug Discovery & Development, Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA.
Amit K TiwariDepartment of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, College of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7427-7155

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biologicals have become an integral part of cancer treatment both as therapeutic agents and as supportive care agents. It is important to know that biologics are large, complex molecular entities requiring extensive immunogenicity testing and pharmacovigilance strategies to ensure no immune response is evoked in the body. Oncology's pharmacological market is dominated by biologics; however, their high development and manufacturing costs are burdensome to health care systems. Biologics being the most expensive prescription drugs on the market limit the accessibility for necessary treatment in the case of many patients. As biologics patents expire, the development of biosimilars is underway in an effort to lower costs and enable patients to access new cancer therapies. Regulatory guidelines for biosimilars have now been established and are constantly being revised to address any issues, facilitating their robust development. Moreover, many scientific societies offer guidance to help stakeholders better understand current regulations and biosimilar's safety. Despite the potential cost benefits, lack of knowledge about biosimilars, and the possibility of immunogenicity have created an uncertain environment for healthcare professionals and patients. In this review, we provide an overview of relevant legislation and regulations, pharmacoeconomics, and stakeholder perceptions regarding biosimilars. The article also describes biosimilars in development, as well as the ones currently available on the market.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsHumansMedical OncologyAntineoplastic AgentsBiosimilar Pharmaceuticalsbevacizumabbiosimilarsepoetinsfilgrastimnew developmentsoncologypegfilgrastimrituximab

Identifiers

PMID36195576
PMCPMC9675387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.