Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36195439›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2022

Active Licking Shapes Cortical Taste Coding.

Camden Neese, Cecilia G Bouaichi, Tom Needham, Martin Bauer, Richard Bertram, Roberto Vincis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cortical Coding of Gustatory and Thermal Signals in Active Licking Mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Neural Activity in the Anterior Insula at Drinking Onset and Licking Relates to Compulsion-Like Alcohol Consumption.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Camden NeeseDepartment of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306.
Cecilia G BouaichiDepartment of Biological Science and Program in Neuroscience, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306.
Tom NeedhamDepartment of Mathematics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306.
Martin BauerDepartment of Mathematics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306.
Richard BertramDepartment of Mathematics and Programs in Neuroscience and Molecular Biophysics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8577-2592
Roberto VincisDepartment of Biological Science and Program in Neuroscience, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306 rvincis@fsu.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5812-7624

Funding

Chemosensory Training Program (CTP)T32DC000044 · NIDCD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DEBRA Ann FADOOL · 1995 to 2026
$5.3M
Understanding the contribution of the mediodorsal thalamus in gustatory processingR01DC019326 · NIDCD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Roberto Vincis · 2022 to 2026
$1.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC019326NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurons in the gustatory cortex (GC) represent taste through time-varying changes in their spiking activity. The predominant view is that the neural firing rate represents the sole unit of taste information. It is currently not known whether the phase of spikes relative to lick timing is used by GC neurons for taste encoding. To address this question, we recorded spiking activity from >500 single GC neurons in male and female mice permitted to freely lick to receive four liquid gustatory stimuli and water. We developed a set of data analysis tools to determine the ability of GC neurons to discriminate gustatory information and then to quantify the degree to which this information exists in the spike rate versus the spike timing or phase relative to licks. These tools include machine learning algorithms for classification of spike trains and methods from geometric shape and functional data analysis. Our results show that while GC neurons primarily encode taste information using a rate code, the timing of spikes is also an important factor in taste discrimination. A further finding is that taste discrimination using spike timing is improved when the timing of licks is considered in the analysis. That is, the interlick phase of spiking provides more information than the absolute spike timing itself. Overall, our analysis demonstrates that the ability of GC neurons to distinguish among tastes is best when spike rate and timing is interpreted relative to the timing of licks.

Indexed as

TasteTaste PerceptionAction PotentialsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalFemaleMaleMiceNeuronscodingelastic shape analysisgustatory cortexlickingsupport vector machinetaste

Identifiers

PMID36195439
PMCPMC9671578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.