Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36195438›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2022

Stable Working Memory and Perceptual Representations in Macaque Lateral Prefrontal Cortex during Naturalistic Vision.

Megan Roussy, Benjamin Corrigan, Rogelio Luna, Roberto A Gulli, Adam J Sachs, Lena Palaniyappan, Julio C Martinez-Trujillo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Naturalistic computational psychiatry: How to get there?Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Megan RoussyDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Western University, London, Ontario N6A 5C1, Canada mroussy2@uwo.ca julio.martinez@robarts.ca.
Benjamin CorriganDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Western University, London, Ontario N6A 5C1, Canada.
Rogelio LunaDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Western University, London, Ontario N6A 5C1, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0711-7562
Roberto A GulliMortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027.
Adam J SachsThe Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada.
Lena PalaniyappanDepartment of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1A1, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1640-7182
Julio C Martinez-TrujilloDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Western University, London, Ontario N6A 5C1, Canada mroussy2@uwo.ca julio.martinez@robarts.ca.
Western University · CADouglas Mental Health University Institute · CAMIND Research Institute · USUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primates use perceptual and mnemonic visuospatial representations to perform everyday functions. Neurons in the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) have been shown to encode both of these representations during tasks where eye movements are strictly controlled and visual stimuli are reduced in complexity. This raises the question of whether perceptual and mnemonic representations encoded by LPFC neurons remain robust during naturalistic vision-in the presence of a rich visual scenery and during eye movements. Here we investigate this issue by training macaque monkeys to perform working memory and perception tasks in a visually complex virtual environment that requires navigation using a joystick and allows for free visual exploration of the scene. We recorded the activity of 3950 neurons in the LPFC (areas 8a and 9/46) of two male rhesus macaques using multielectrode arrays, and measured eye movements using video tracking. We found that navigation trajectories to target locations and eye movement behavior differed between the perception and working memory tasks, suggesting that animals used different behavioral strategies. Single neurons were tuned to target location during cue encoding and working memory delay, and neural ensemble activity was predictive of the behavior of the animals. Neural decoding of the target location was stable throughout the working memory delay epoch. However, neural representations of similar target locations differed between the working memory and perception tasks. These findings indicate that during naturalistic vision, LPFC neurons maintain robust and distinct neural codes for mnemonic and perceptual visuospatial representations.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermPrefrontal CortexAnimalsEye MovementsMacaca mulattaMaleNeuronsnonhuman primateprefrontal cortexvisual perceptionworking memory

Identifiers

PMID36195438
PMCPMC9653275
OpenAlexW4301180992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.