Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36195116›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2022

The motor Wisdom of the Crowd.

Gabriel Madirolas, Regina Zaghi-Lara, Alex Gomez-Marin, Alfonso Pérez-Escudero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The motor Wisdom of the Crowd.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gabriel MadirolasResearch Centre on Animal Cognition (CRCA), Centre for Integrative Biology (CBI), Toulouse University, CNRS, UPS, 31062 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4526-4507
Regina Zaghi-LaraBehavior of Organisms Laboratory, Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante (CSIC-UMH), Alicante, Spain.
Alex Gomez-MarinBehavior of Organisms Laboratory, Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante (CSIC-UMH), Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2764-2583
Alfonso Pérez-EscuderoResearch Centre on Animal Cognition (CRCA), Centre for Integrative Biology (CBI), Toulouse University, CNRS, UPS, 31062 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4782-6139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wisdom of the Crowd is the aggregation of many individual estimates to obtain a better collective one. Because of its enormous social potential, this effect has been thoroughly investigated, but predominantly on tasks that involve rational thinking (such as estimating a number). Here we tested this effect in the context of drawing geometrical shapes, which still enacts cognitive processes but mainly involves visuomotor control. We asked more than 700 school students to trace five patterns shown on a touchscreen and then aggregated their individual trajectories to improve the match with the original pattern. Our results show the characteristics of the strongest examples of Wisdom of the Crowd. First, the aggregate trajectory can be up to 5 times more accurate than the individual ones. Second, this great improvement requires aggregating trajectories from different individuals (rather than trials from the same individual). Third, the aggregate trajectory outperforms more than 99% of individual trajectories. Fourth, while older individuals outperform younger ones, a crowd of young individuals outperforms the average older one. These results demonstrate for the first time Wisdom of the Crowd in the realm of motor control, opening the door to further studies of human and also animal behavioural trajectories and their mechanistic underpinnings.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsMotor SkillsHumansStudentscollective intelligencetouchscreen tracingtrajectory aggregationvisuomotor controlWisdom of the Crowd

Identifiers

PMID36195116
PMCPMC9532022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.