Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36194777›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2022

Can Closed-Set Word Recognition Differentially Assess Vowel and Consonant Perception for School-Age Children With and Without Hearing Loss?

Emily Buss, Jenna Felder, Margaret K Miller, Lori J Leibold, Lauren Calandruccio

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Temporal and Spectral Cues for Phoneme Perception in School-Age Children and Adults.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emily BussDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.ORCID 0000-0001-8244-3013
Jenna FelderMED-EL Corporation, Durham, NC.
Margaret K MillerHuman Auditory Development Laboratory, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE.ORCID 0000-0002-5095-5927
Lori J LeiboldHuman Auditory Development Laboratory, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE.ORCID 0000-0001-7250-7781
Lauren CalandruccioDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.ORCID 0000-0002-1532-7036
Google (United States) · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Factors influencing the behavioral assessment of hearing during infancy and childhoodR01DC014460 · NIDCD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSS, EMILY · 2015 to 2019
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeVowels and consonants play different roles in language acquisition and speech recognition, yet standard clinical tests do not assess vowel and consonant perception separately. As a result, opportunities for targeted intervention may be lost. This study evaluated closed-set word recognition tests designed to rely predominantly on either vowel or consonant perception and compared results with sentence recognition scores.

methodParticipants were children (5-17 years of age) and adults (18-38 years of age) with normal hearing and children with sensorineural hearing loss (7-17 years of age). Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured in speech-shaped noise. Children with hearing loss were tested with their hearing aids. Word recognition was evaluated using a three-alternative forced-choice procedure, with a picture-pointing response; monosyllabic target words varied with respect to either consonant or vowel content. Sentence recognition was evaluated for low- and high-probability sentences. In a subset of conditions, stimuli were low-pass filtered to simulate a steeply sloping hearing loss in participants with normal hearing.

resultsChildren's SRTs improved with increasing age for words and sentences. Low-pass filtering had a larger effect for consonant-variable words than vowel-variable words for both children and adults with normal hearing, consistent with the greater high-frequency content of consonants. Children with hearing loss tested with hearing aids tended to perform more poorly than age-matched children with normal hearing, particularly for sentence recognition, but consonant- and vowel-variable word recognition did not appear to be differentially affected by the amount of high- and low-frequency hearing loss.

conclusionsClosed-set recognition of consonant- and vowel-variable words appeared to differentially evaluate vowel and consonant perception but did not vary by configuration of hearing loss in this group of pediatric hearing aid users. Word scores obtained in this manner do not fully characterize the auditory abilities necessary for open-set sentence recognition, but they do provide a general estimate.

Indexed as

DeafnessHearing AidsHearing LossHearing Loss, SensorineuralSpeech PerceptionAdolescentAdultChildHumansNoise

Identifiers

PMID36194777
PMCPMC9927623
OpenAlexW4301185419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.