ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Skin Cancer Margin Classification From Digital Histopathology Images Using Deep Learning.
Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deepath-SCC: a deep learning model for accurate tissue origin identification in squamous cell carcinoma.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Vision Transformers for Low-Quality Histopathological Images: A Case Study on Squamous Cell Carcinoma Margin Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Oral squamous cell carcinoma grading classification using deep transformer encoder assisted dilated convolution with global attention.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Pathological Features and What They Mean for Prognosis and Treatment.Cancers · 2024Review
- Article
- Automated cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma grading using deep learning with transfer learning.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesNow a days, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) margin assessment is done by examining histopathology images and inspection of whole slide images (WSI) using a conventional microscope. This is time-consuming, tedious, and depends on experts' experience which may lead to misdiagnosis and mistreatment plans. This study aims to develop a system for the automatic diagnosis of skin cancer margin for squamous cell carcinoma from histopathology microscopic images by applying deep learning techniques.
methodsThe system was trained, validated, and tested using histopathology images of SCC cancer locally acquired from Jimma Medical Center Pathology Department from seven different skin sites using an Olympus digital microscope. All images were preprocessed and trained with transfer learning pre-trained models by fine-tuning the hyper-parameter of the selected models.
resultsThe overall best training accuracy of the models become 95.3%, 97.1%, 89.8%, and 89.9% on EffecientNetB0, MobileNetv2, ResNet50, VGG16 respectively. In addition to this, the best validation accuracy of the models was 94.7%, 91.8%, 87.8%, and 86.7% respectively. The best testing accuracy of the models at the same epoch was 95.2%, 91.5%, 87%, and 85.5% respectively. From these models, EfficientNetB0 showed the best average training and testing accuracy than the other models.
conclusionsThe system assists the pathologist during the margin assessment of SCC by decreasing the diagnosis time from an average of 25 minutes to less than a minute.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.