Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36194620›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Fast Event-Related Mapping of Population Fingertip Tuning Properties in Human Sensorimotor Cortex at 7T.

Sarah Khalife, Susan T Francis, Denis Schluppeck, Rosa-Maria Sánchez-Panchuelo, Julien Besle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah KhalifeDepartment of Psychology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, 11072020, Lebanon.
Susan T FrancisSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG72RD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0903-7507
Denis SchluppeckVisual Neuroscience Group, School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG72RD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0634-7713
Rosa-Maria Sánchez-PanchueloNational Institute for Health and Care Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG72RD, United Kingdom.
Julien BesleDepartment of Psychology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, 11072020, Lebanon julien.besle@aub.edu.lb.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8792-1712
University of Nottingham · GBAmerican University of Beirut · LBAmerican University of Beirut Medical Center · LB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G008906/1Medical Research Council MR/M022722/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

fMRI studies that investigate somatotopic tactile representations in the human cortex typically use either block or phase-encoded stimulation designs. Event-related (ER) designs allow for more flexible and unpredictable stimulation sequences than the other methods, but they are less efficient. Here, we compared an efficiency-optimized fast ER design (2.8-s average intertrial interval; ITI) to a conventional slow ER design (8-s average ITI) for mapping voxelwise fingertip tactile tuning properties in the sensorimotor cortex of six participants at 7 Tesla. The fast ER design yielded more reliable responses compared with the slow ER design, but with otherwise similar tuning properties. Concatenating the fast and slow ER data, we demonstrate in each individual brain the existence of two separate somatotopically-organized tactile representations of the fingertips, one in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) on the postcentral gyrus, and the other shared across the motor and premotor cortices on the precentral gyrus. In both S1 and motor representations, fingertip selectivity decreased progressively, from narrowly-tuned Brodmann area (BA) 3b and BA4a, respectively, toward associative parietal and frontal regions that responded equally to all fingertips, suggesting increasing information integration along these two pathways. In addition, fingertip selectivity in S1 decreased from the cortical representation of the thumb to that of the pinky.

Indexed as

Brain MappingTouch PerceptionFingersHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingSomatosensory Cortexevent-relatedmotor cortexpopulation receptive fieldsomatosensory cortextactile perceptionultra-high field fMRI

Identifiers

PMID36194620
PMCPMC9480917
OpenAlexW4294043556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.